Cover page

Series page

Key Contemporary Thinkers

  1. Lee Braver, Heidegger
  2. John Burgess, Kripke
  3. Claire Colebrook and Jason Maxwell, Agamben
  4. Jean-Pierre Couture, Sloterdijk
  5. Rosemary Cowan, Cornel West
  6. George Crowder, Isaiah Berlin
  7. Gareth Dale, Karl Polanyi
  8. Colin Davis, Levinas
  9. Oliver Davis, Jacques Rancière
  10. Gerard de Vries, Bruno Latour
  11. Reidar Andreas Due, Deleuze
  12. Edward Fullbrook and Kate Fullbrook, Simone de Beauvoir
  13. Andrew Gamble, Hayek
  14. Neil Gascoigne, Richard Rorty
  15. Nigel Gibson, Fanon
  16. Graeme Gilloch, Siegfried Kracauer
  17. Graeme Gilloch, Walter Benjamin
  18. Phillip Hansen, Hannah Arendt
  19. Sean Homer, Fredric Jameson
  20. Christina Howells, Derrida
  21. Simon Jarvis, Adorno
  22. Rachel Jones, Irigaray
  23. Sarah Kay, Žižek
  24. S. K. Keltner, Kristeva
  25. Valerie Kennedy, Edward Said
  26. Chandran Kukathas and Philip Pettit, Rawls
  27. Moya Lloyd, Judith Butler
  28. James McGilvray, Chomsky, 2nd Edition
  29. Lois McNay, Foucault
  30. Dermot Moran, Edmund Husserl
  31. Michael Moriarty, Roland Barthes
  32. Marie-Eve Morin, Jean-Luc Nancy
  33. Stephen Morton, Gayatri Spivak
  34. Timothy Murphy, Antonio Negri
  35. William Outhwaite, Habermas, 2nd Edition
  36. Kari Palonen, Quentin Skinner
  37. Ed Pluth, Badiou
  38. John Preston, Feyerabend
  39. Chris Rojek, Stuart Hall
  40. Severin Schroeder, Wittgenstein
  41. Anthony Paul Smith, Laruelle
  42. Dennis Smith, Zygmunt Bauman
  43. Felix Stalder, Manuel Castells
  44. Georgia Warnke, Gadamer
  45. Jonathan Wolff, Robert Nozick
  46. Christopher Zurn, Axel Honneth
Title page

Copyright page

Preface

“When men cannot observe, they don't have ideas; they have obsessions,” V. S. Naipaul wrote. The modern philosophical tradition holds observation in high regard; nevertheless it is obsessed by a worldview that feeds off dualities – between humans and nonhumans, nature and society, facts and values, science and politics. Bruno Latour wants us to observe better, with a finer resolution. To become more attentive, to redescribe the world we live in, and to better understand our current predicament, he introduced ethnography and comparative anthropology as vital methods for philosophy. Latour is an ‘empirical philosopher’.

This introduction to his work follows Latour in his footsteps, both as an ethnographer and as a philosopher. The light tone of much of Latour's writing may easily conceal its profundity. Latour takes issue with much of what we take for granted as intuitively evident. By following Latour's moves closely and by providing some background from science studies, philosophy and sociology, to show to what extent and in what sense Latour's work stands out against the tradition, I hope to ease access to what Latour claims to be a richer vocabulary to account for who we are and what we value, that is, a better, fairer common sense.

Latour is a prolific writer on an amazingly varied set of topics, so some selection was inevitable. To introduce his empirical work, Latour's studies on science, law and religion will be discussed in detail; they led to substantial philosophical innovations. Latour's philosophy – his thoughts on science, on actor-network theory, cosmopolitics and his anthropology of the Moderns – is introduced roughly in the order in which they took shape. But this is not an intellectual biography; the historical and intellectual context in which Latour's thoughts evolved is only touched upon. That also holds for the reception of his work. This is an introduction to Latour's philosophy; not to science studies as a discipline, nor to the work of those who have followed Latour, used his ideas, or thought they did.

To write about a living author is an unquiet affair. With the advantage of hindsight it becomes apparent that Latour's work has been driven by a coherent heuristic. But those who followed his work were often puzzled when he took his thoughts to new levels and new domains or when he introduced conceptual innovations. We met in the early 1980s and stayed in contact ever since. Time and again he forced me to rethink his position, as well as my own.

I want to thank Bruno Latour and my Dutch friends and colleagues Huub Dijstelbloem, Rob Hagendijk, Hans Harbers, Josta de Hoog, Noortje Marres and Annemiek Nelis for their comments on the draft of this book. I'm also very grateful to John Naughton for his comments and for helping me out with the subtleties of the English grammar. As always, my gratitude to Pauline extends far beyond her comments on my writing.

Abbreviations

For full bibliographical details see the References.

AIME An Inquiry into Modes of Existence – An Anthropology of the Moderns
AR Aramis or the Love of Technology
CB La Clef de Berlin et autre leçons d’un amateur de sciences
CM Petite reflexion sur le culte moderne des dieux faitiches
FG Face à Gaïa
ICON Iconoclash – Beyond the Image Wars in Science, Religion, and Art
IRR Irreductions (part 2 of The Pasteurization of France, cited by paragraph number)
LL Laboratory Life – The Social Construction of Scientific Facts
LL2 Laboratory Life – The Construction of Scientific Facts (2nd edition)
ML The Making of Law
MTP Making Things Public – Atmospheres of Democracy
NBM We Have Never Been Modern
PF The Pasteurization of France
PH Pandora's Hope – Essays on the Reality of Science Studies
PN Politics of Nature – How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy
PVI Paris ville invisible
RAS Reassembling the Social – An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory
REJ Rejoicing – Or the Torments of Religious Speech
SA Science in Action
SPI The Science of Passionate Interests