Cover Page

Grounding and Shielding

Circuits and Interference

 

SIXTH EDITION

 

Ralph Morrison

Wiley Logo

Preface to the Sixth Edition

Six editions of a book that spans 50 years is surely unique. I want to thank John Wiley for staying with me for all these decades. I want to thank Brett Kurzman, my new editor, for getting me a contract. I want to thank my wife Elizabeth for her continuous support. I want to thank all the readers that have supported me over the years. If it had not been for the urging of Dan Beeker of NXP Semiconductor, there would not have been a fifth edition. For this reason, I owe him a “thank you” for making a sixth edition possible. I have been puzzling how to make this edition more effective and I feel my opening statements are key. I need to tell the story so that the reader will appreciate my approach.

There are many meanings to the words grounding and shielding. To an English speaker, the nonengineering application of the word “ground” can include such diverse usage as coffee grounds, grounds for dismissal, playgrounds, ground round, or ground floor. The nonengineering use of shield can include such topics as windshield, police badge, metal armor, or protective clothing. In an electrical sense, ground can mean earth, the minus side of a battery, the conducting plane on a circuit board, the neutral power conductor, or a metal cabinet. People involved with electricity often associate these words with protection against electrical interference. The book title is intended to convey this meaning. Each reader of this book will start with a unique set of experiences associated with these words. I want to broaden that experience.

I have been involved in electrical grounding and shielding for over 50 years. My understanding comes from my experiences, my interests, and from my education. I have rewritten this book every 10 years since 1967 because the electrical world keeps changing. Also, I keep learning and the books do sell. Grounding and Shielding is an important topic as it relates to both cost and performance in about every aspect of our modern technology. The subject is difficult to present for many reasons. First, it is related more closely to conductor geometry than it is to circuit content. Next, a lot of the information that is passed on through usage is simply lore and some of it is wrong or misleading. This means that often engineers have preconceived ideas and need to do some unlearning to get things straight. In some cases, the grounding rules a user must follow are a part of a code or a regulation that leaves no choices. When the rules are printed on fancy paper, it is easy to assume they are valid. If the rules are in error, arguing against the establishment can be very frustrating. Unfortunately, not all rules are effective or practical. And finally, the subject is not taught in schools and engineers are often on their own to find answers. I have also found that quality control people will follow written rules rather than the opinion of one outside engineer or author. They respect authority, which is what they are expected to do. I have had some polite arguments that have lasted years, where my viewpoint keeps being questioned. From this fact alone, I know just how ingrained some viewpoints can become.

The subject of grounding and shielding comes up in most designs. Because it is not an exact science, there can be many opinions as to where to connect shields and reference signals. Some approaches are lore and are passed on by copying past designs or by word of mouth. In most cases, there is no simple test that tells if a viewpoint is valid. We may know how to test a piece of hardware but testing a building is another matter. There is an important question that must be asked. What measurements would you like to make? Where do I put my voltage probes? Even if tests could be made, making changes to a large system can be very expensive. In many cases, the ideas used in a design are valid but over some limited range. A person with a misconception may find it difficult to accept a different explanation. This is especially true when many different opinions have been expressed. I find that for good reason, engineers are very skeptical about an explanation that suggests a new viewpoint. They do not know what or whom to believe. Another problem is that the engineering idiom is constantly changing and sometimes valid explanations fail to communicate. The subject lies somewhere between trade practices and physics and this is a wide separation. It is a subject area that does not fit into academia. To some managers, grounding seems like a job for a technician. In reality, it is often a very sophisticated and complex issue. For these and many other reasons, it is time to write a sixth edition. I want to try to get the message across for today's designers. As much as possible, I want to keep opinions to a minimum and I want to focus on connecting this subject to basic principles. I want to use physics as the basis for explanations but without getting too mathematical.

I have taken what I feel is a unique position in discussing grounding and shielding. Circuit theory leaves the distinct impression that conductors carry signals. The fact is that conductors guide the flow of field energy and this field energy can carry signals, interference, and operate components. Nature does not distinguish between these three functions. We definitely need circuits to describe our intentions. We need circuit theory to analyze these circuits. We need to apply basic physics when circuit theory is not sufficient. We have to keep power, signals, and interference separated because nature is not going to offer any help. We need to appreciate that nearly all electrical activity takes place in the spaces between conductors. It is the intent of this book to clearly point out how this very key idea can solve problems. This field transport idea is covered in physics courses. The connection between these ideas and practical designing is usually missing in textbooks and in the classroom. The arrangement of the spaces between conductors can keep various fields separated. This control of conductor geometry is the job of the designer. This is the central theme of this book.

This book is not an introduction to circuit theory. I assume the reader is familiar with how a circuit works. It is also not an introduction to applied physics. It is about all the things that happen when an education meets the real world. The problems that are solved in a textbook are nothing like the problems that are faced by the new designer. After graduation, there are no teachers around to explain how to proceed.

I solved many problems using my intuition and my past experiences. Little by little my understanding grew. Over time, it became clear that I should have used more of my education and less of my intuition. This is easy to say and not very easy to do. In the real world, problems must be resolved not studied. Most problems are multidimensional and do not fit just one subject. Finding a way through a maze may not be very efficient but experimenting with the maze to learn more is not often done. That takes time and that means spending resources.

I was told about displacement current in college. I never appreciated the value of this concept until I began writing about digital circuits. Then I discovered this idea let me explain how current flows into the distributed capacitance of a transmission line. In reading the literature, I had never seen this explanation. I present this idea in this book and I hope it helps to explain the real world to others.

In looking back at the fifth edition, I noticed how austere Chapter 1 appeared. Reading this material seemed a little like taking medicine to get well. It is not fun. Even though I wrote it with good intentions and I was excited to tell this story, the material did not appear inviting. To correct this condition, I decided to open this sixth edition with some of my background and describe a few of my experiences to illustrate why this basic physics is critical to an understanding of grounding and shielding. So stay with me as I go back in time. I think the history is both interesting and insightful.

RALPH MORRISON

July 1, 2015

San Bruno, CA