Cover: A Companion to Ancient Near Eastern Languages, 1 by Rebecca Hasselbach-Andee

BLACKWELL COMPANIONS TO THE ANCIENT WORLD

This series provides sophisticated and authoritative overviews of periods of ancient history, genres of classical literature, and the most important themes in ancient culture. Each volume comprises between twenty‐five and forty concise essays written by individual scholars within their area of specialization. The essays are written in a clear, provocative, and lively manner, designed for an international audience of scholars, students, and general readers.

A Companion to Latin Literature
Edited by Stephen Harrison

A Companion to the Ancient Near East
Edited by Daniel C. Snell

A Companion to Ancient Epic
Edited by John Miles Foley

A Companion to Greek Tragedy
Edited by Justina Gregory

A Companion to the Roman Empire
Edited by David S. Potter

A Companion to the Roman Republic
Edited by Nathan Rosenstein and Robert Morstein‐Marx

A Companion to the Classical Greek World
Edited by Konrad H. Kinzl

A Companion to Roman Rhetoric
Edited by William Dominik and Jon Hall

A Companion to Roman Religion
Edited by Jörg Rüpke

A Companion to the Classical Tradition
Edited by Craig W. Kallendorf

A Companion to Greek Rhetoric
Edited by Ian Worthington

A Companion to Catullus
Edited by Marilyn B. Skinner

A Companion to Classical Receptions
Edited by Lorna Hardwick and Christopher Stray

A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought
Edited by Ryan K. Balot

A Companion to the Roman Army
Edited by Paul Erdkamp

A Companion to Greek Religion
Edited by Daniel Ogden

A Companion to Ancient History
Edited by Andrew Erskine

A Companion to Ovid
Edited by Peter E. Knox

A Companion to Archaic Greece
Edited by Kurt A. Raaflaub and Hans van Wees

A Companion to Late Antiquity
Edited by Philip Rousseau

A Companion to Julius Caesar
Edited by Miriam Griffin

A Companion to Hellenistic Literature
James J. Clauss and Martine Cuypers

A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language
Edited by Egbert J. Bakker

A Companion to Byzantium
Edited by Liz James

A Companion to Horace
Edited by Gregson Davis

A Companion to Ancient Macedonia
Edited by Joseph Roisman and Ian Worthington

A Companion to Families in the Greek and Roman Worlds
Edited by Beryl Rawson

A Companion to Greek Mythology
Edited by Ken Dowden and Niall Livingston

A Companion to the Latin Language
Edited by James Clackson

A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography
Edited by John Marincola

A Companion to the Punic Wars
Edited by Dexter Hoyos

A Companion to Women in the Ancient World
Edited by Sharon L. James and Sheila Dillon

A Companion to Sophocles
Edited by Kirk Ormand

A Companion to Marcus Aurelius
Edited by Marcel van Ackeren

A Companion to the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East
Edited by Daniel T. Potts

A Companion to Augustine
Edited by Mark Vessey

A Companion to Roman Love Elegy
Edited by Barbara K. Gold

A Companion to Greek Art
Tyler Jo Smith and Dimitris Plantzos

A Companion to Persius and Juvenal
Edited by Susanna Braund and Josiah Osgood

A Companion to Tacitus
Edited by Victoria Emma Pagán

A Companion to Ancient Greek Government
Edited by Hans Beck

A Companion to the Neronian Age
Edited by Emma Buckley and Martin Dinter

A Companion to the Archaeology of the Roman Republic
Edited by Jane DeRose Evans

A Companion to Terence
Edited by Antony Augoustakis and Ariana Traill

A Companion to Roman Architecture
Edited by Roger B. Ulrich and Caroline K. Quenemoen

A Companion to the Ancient Novel
Edited by Edmund P. Cueva and Shannon N. Byrne

A Companion to Ethnicity in the Ancient Mediterranean
Edited by Jeremy McInerney

A Companion to Sport and Spectacle in Greek and Roman Antiquity
Edited by Paul Christesen and Donald G. Kyle

A Companion to Greek and Roman Sexualities
Edited by Thomas K. Hubbard

A Companion to Plutarch
Edited by Mark Beck

A Companion to Ancient Thrace
Edited by Julia Valeva, Emil Nankov, and Denver Graninger

A Companion to the Archaeology of Religion in the Ancient World
Edited by Rubina Raja and Jörg Rüpke

A Companion to Ancient Aesthetics
Edited by Pierre Destrée and Penelope Murray

A Companion to Food in the Ancient World
Edited by John Wilkins and Robin Nadeau

A Companion to Ancient Education
Edited by W. Martin Bloomer

A Companion to Greek Literature
Edited by Martin Hose and David Schenker

A Companion to Greek Democracy and the Roman Republic
Edited by Dean Hammer

A Companion to Livy
Edited by Bernard Mineo

A Companion to Ancient Egyptian Art
Edited by Melinda K. Hartwig

A Companion to Roman Art
Edited by Barbara E. Borg

A Companion to the Etruscans
Edited by Sinclair Bell and Alexandra A. Carpino

A Companion to the Flavian Age of Imperial Rome
Edited by Andrew Zissos

A Companion to Roman Italy
Edited by Alison E. Cooley

A Companion to Science, Technology, and Medicine in Ancient

Greek and Rome
Edited by Georgia L. Irby

A Companion to Greek Architecture
Edited by Margaret M. Miles

A Companion to Josephus
Edited by Honora Howell Chapman and Zuleika Rodgers

A Companion to Assyria
Edited by Eckart Frahm

A Companion to Ancient Greece and Rome on Screen
Edited by Arthur J. Pomeroy

A Companion to Euripides
Edited by Laura K. McClure

A Companion to Sparta
Edited by Anton Powell

A Companion to Greco‐Roman and Late Antique Egypt
Edited by Katelijn Vandorpe

A Companion to Ancient Near Eastern Languages
Edited by Rebecca Hasselbach‐Andee

A COMPANION TO ANCIENT NEAR EASTERN LANGUAGES

Edited by

Rebecca Hasselbach‐Andee







No alt text required.

List of Illustrations

1.1 Rosetta Stone: an early lithograph.
1.2a The decipherments by Barthélemy and Silvestre de Sacy. Source: Barthélemy 1759: Palmyrene.
1.2b The decipherments by Barthélemy and Silvestre de Sacy. Source: Barthélemy 1764: Phoenician.
1.2c The decipherments by Barthélemy and Silvestre de Sacy. Source: Barthélemy 1768a: Aramaic.
1.2d The decipherments by Barthélemy and Silvestre de Sacy. Source: Silvestre de Sacy 1787–91: Parthian and Sassanian.
1.3 The chart of cuneiform signs used by Hincks. Source: Fisher 1807; from a private collection, ex Albrecht Goetze.
1.4a The decipherment of Himyaritic (South Arabian). Source: Two Arabic manuscripts (Rödiger 1837).
1.4b The decipherment of Himyaritic (South Arabian). Source: The Himyaritic script (Gesenius 1841).
1.5a The earliest Ugaritic charts. Assyriologists organized the letters by shape, Semitists by Hebrew alphabetical order. Source: Bauer 1930.
1.5b The earliest Ugaritic charts. Assyriologists organized the letters by shape, Semitists by Hebrew alphabetical order. Source: Dhorme 1930.
1.5c The earliest Ugaritic charts. Assyriologists organized the letters by shape, Semitists by Hebrew alphabetical order. Source: Virolleaud, Charles. 1931. “Un poème phénicien de Ras‐Shamra.” Syria 12: 193–224.
1.5d The earliest Ugaritic charts. Assyriologists organized the letters by shape, Semitists by Hebrew alphabetical order. Source: Albright 1932.
2.1 This text (OIM A2515; 5.9 × 3.4 × 1.6 cm) from the Uruk III period (c. 3100 bce) describes the amount of barley, approximately 25 ≈ 6 = 150 Cuneiform sign representing bushel. (‘bushels’), needed for a field of 10 bur3 (1 bur3 = 6.5 hectares = c. 16 acres). Source: From Woods 2010, 79 (with previous bibliography; modified after original provided by Robert K. Englund).
2.2 Administrative precursors of cuneiform. Source: Schmandt‐Besserat 1992; after Englund 2004, 121, figure 5.12.
2.3 In the Uruk III texts, incising is replaced by impressing the triangular cross‐sectioned stylus into the surface of the clay tablet. Source: After Nissen 1986, 320, figure 2.
2.4 The evolution of cuneiform signs. Source: After Cooper 2004, 85.
3.1 Systematic pair production from the time of the Memphite reform of the writing system.
3.2 Utilization of the human body as source of signs in the Memphite reform of the writing system. Source: Kahl, Jochem. 1994.
4.1 Serabit el‐Khadem Inscription.
4.2 Wadi el‐Hol Inscription.
4.3 Bronze Dagger from Lachish.
4.4 Incised Jerusalem Pithos.

List of Tables

1.1 Decipherment Possibilities.
5.1 Chronological chart.
5.2 Sumerian Four‐Vowel Reconstruction.
5.3 Reconstructed Sumerian consonantal inventory.
5.4 Hypothetical mid/late third millennium Sumerian consonantal inventory suggested by Jagersma (201, 33).
5.5 Sumerian noun phrase case marking.
5.6 Sumerian independent pronouns.
5.7 Sumerian bound possessive pronouns.
5.8 Outer aspect distinctions in the Sumerian verb.
5.9 Basic morphological structure of the Sumerian verb.
5.10 Distribution of Sumerian indexing morphs.
5.11 Sumerian indexing morphs.
6.1 System of Earlier Egyptian consonantal phonemes.
6.2 System of Coptic consonantal phonemes.
6.3 Vowels in Earlier Egyptian.
6.4 Vowels in Sahidic Coptic.
6.5 Earlier Egyptian syllabic structures.
6.6 Coptic syllabic structures.
6.7 Nouns in Earlier Egyptian.
6.8 Personal pronouns in Earlier Egyptian.
7.1 Akkadian dialect division.
7.2 Akkadian vowels.
7.3 Akkadian consonantal inventory.
7.4 Akkadian nominal inflection.
7.5 Conjugation of the predicative verbal adjective.
7.6 Old Babylonian independent pronouns.
7.7 Old Babylonian pronominal suffixes.
7.8 Conjugation of finite verbal forms.
7.9 Old Babylonian imperative.
7.10 Old Babylonian precative.
7.11 Basic forms of the D‐, Š‐ and N‐stems.
7.12 Akkadian t‐stems.
7.13 Akkadian tan‐/tn‐stems.
8.1 Eblaite vowels.
8.2 Eblaite consonantal inventory.
8.3 Eblaite inflection of the noun.
8.4 Eblaite predicative adjective.
8.5 Eblaite independent pronouns.
8.6 Eblaite pronominal suffixes.
8.7 Eblaite relative‐determinative pronoun.
8.8 Conjugation of the strong verb in Eblaite.
8.9 Eblaite imperative.
8.10 Eblaite precative.
8.11 Basic forms of the D‐, S‐, and N‐stems in Eblaite.
8.12 Eblaite t‐stems.
8.13 Eblaite tn‐stems.
9.1 Elamite consonontal inventory.
9.2 Elamite nominal classifying suffixes.
9.3 Examples of use of classifying suffixes.
9.4 Elamite independent pronouns of the 1st and 2nd person.
9.5 Elamite resumptive pronoun used as 3rd person independent pronoun.
9.6 Elamite demonstrative pronouns.
9.7 Elamite possessive pronouns.
9.8 Elamite enclitic possessive pronouns.
9.9 Elamite verbal conjugation.
9.10 Verbal conjugation: examples.
9.11 Elamite k‐conjugation.
9.12 Elamite k‐conjugation: examples.
9.13 Elamite n‐conjugation.
9.14 Elamite n‐conjugation: examples.
9.15 Elamite m‐conjugation.
9.16 Elamite m‐conjugation: examples.
10.1 Amorite consonantal inventory.
10.2 Amorite verbal forms.
10.3 Weak verbs in Amorite.
11.1 Use of CV signs in Mittani Letter.
11.2 Hurrian consonants.
11.3 Possessive morphemes.
11.4 Valence‐marking morphemes.
12.1 The Phonological System of Hittite (tentative reconstruction).
12.2 Indicative Endings of Old Hittite Active Verbs.
12.3 Old Hittite Nominal Declension.
13.1 Luwian phonemic inventory.
13.2 Luwian nominal inflection.
13.3 Luwian demonstrative pronouns.
13.4 Luwian relative‐interrogative pronouns.
13.5 Luwian orthotonic personal pronouns of 1st and 2nd person.
13.6 Luwian enclitic personal pronouns.
13.7 Inflection of finite verbs in Luwian.
14.1 Ugaritic consonants (traditional transcription in italics, hypothetical IPA values in brackets).
14.2 The Proto‐Semitic lateral series, and their presumed reflexes in Ugaritic.
14.3 Ugaritic etymological vowels, inherited from Proto‐Semitic.
14.4 The Ugaritic nominal inflection.
14.5 The Ugaritic suffixing conjugation.
14.6 Ugaritic PC (indicative).
14.7 Ugaritic PC (jussive).
14.8 Ugaritic PC (volitive forms in ‐a).
14.9 The Ugaritic imperative.
14.10 Verbal bases of the principle stems.
14.11 Verbal bases for stems with an internal passive (hypothetical).
14.12 Verbal bases for the stems with the infix ‐ta‐.
14.13 Ugaritic independent pronouns (nominative forms).
14.14 Ugaritic independent pronouns (oblique forms).
14.15 Ugaritic suffixed pronouns.
14.16 Forms of the relative pronoun in Ugaritic.
15.1 Hebrew independent pronouns and pronominal suffixes.
15.2 Nouns with pronominal suffixes.
15.3 Hebrew verbal stems.
15.4 Hebrew verbal conjugations.
16.1 Phoenician consonants (traditional transcription in italics, hypothetical IPA values in square brackets).
16.2 The Proto‐Semitic lateral, interdental, and velar‐fricative series, and their presumed reflexes in Phoenician.
16.3 A plausible reconstruction of the Phoenician vowel phonemes.
16.4 The markings of the nominal inflection in Phoenician, shown using the (unchanging) nominal base *sōpir “scribe” as a placeholder example.
16.5 The suffixing conjugation in Phoenician, with the verb KTB “to write” as a placeholder.
16.6 The prefixing conjugation in Phoenician, with the verb KTB “to write” as a placeholder.
16.7 The imperative in Phoenician, with the verb KTB “to write” as a placeholder.
16.8 Hypothetical reconstruction of the verbal bases of the principle stems in Phoenician, with the dummy verb QTL.
16.9 Reconstructed paradigm of the independent personal pronouns in Phoenician.
16.10 Reconstructed paradigm of the suffixed personal pronouns in Phoenician.
17.1 Old Aramaic consonantal inventory.
17.2 Old and Imperial Aramaic vowels.
17.3 Old and Imperial Aramaic nominal declension.
17.4 Old and Imperial Aramaic independent pronouns.
17.5 Old and Imperial Aramaic pronominal suffixes.
17.6 Old and Imperial Aramaic demonstrative pronouns.
17.7 Numbers 1‐10 in Old and Imperial Aramaic.
17.8 Conjugation of the perfect in Old and Imperial Aramaic.
17.9 Conjugation of the imperfect in Old and Imperial Aramaic.
17.10 Imperial Aramaic verbal stems.
18.1 Periodization of Sabaic.
18.2 Transliteration conventions of sibilants.
18.3 Sabaic nominal inflection.
18.4 Sabaic personal pronouns.
18.5 Sabaic verbal stem formation.
18.6 Sabaic verbal inflection in the base stem 01.
27.1 Sumerian Literary Texts found at Hattusa, after Viano 2016, 133 (see for detail).

Notes on Contributors

Françoise Briquel Chatonnet is Senior Researcher in the team “Orient et Méditerranée” at CNRS (Paris). She works on Ancient History of the Levant, Semitic epigraphy and the history of the Semitic alphabet, the history of the Hebrew Bible, and also on Syriac manuscripts and the history of Syriac Christianity.

Dennis R.M. Campbell is an Assistant Professor in the Department of History at San Francisco State University. He specializes in the history and languages of the Ancient Near East with particular focus on Hittite, Hurrian, and Urartian. He has further worked on the administrative material written in Elamite from the Achaemenid Period.

Amalia Catagnoti currently is an Associate Professor of Assyriology at the University of Florence (Italy). She specializes in the study of the 3rd millennium Ebla Texts, publishing administrative and chancery documents. She has written the first comprehensive grammar of the Ebla language.

C. Jay Crisostomo is Assistant Professor of Assyriology at the University of Michigan. His research focuses on Mesopotamian scribal practices and language, in particular Sumerian‐Akkadian multilingualism and translation practices.

Peter T. Daniels is an independent scholar living in New Jersey specializing on writing systems and their typology. He received his advanced degree from the University of Chicago and has taught at the University of Wisconsin‐Milwaukee and Chicago State University.

Margaretha Folmer is a Lecturer at the University of Leiden (Netherlands) and associate professor of Biblical Hebrew at the Vrije Universteit Amsterdam, working on Aramaic language and linguistics, with special focus on Imperial and Qumran Aramaic, Targumic and Biblical literature, language contact, bilingualism, and ancient Jewish Magic.

Viktor Golinets is Professor for Hebrew Linguistics at the Hochschule für Jüdische Studien, Heidelberg (Germany). His main research interests are the philological investigation of Northwest Semitic languages, especially Amorite and Hebrew, with focus on their epigraphic attestations and onomasticon.

Rebecca Hasselbach‐Andee is Associate Professor of Comparative Semitics at the University of Chicago. Her research focuses on the reconstruction of the Semitic language family and individual Semitic languages, especially Akkadian, from a historical linguistic and typological perspective. In more recent work, she has also incorporated socio‐linguistic approaches to Semitic languages.

Robert Hawley holds the chair (directeur d’études) in “Religions and cultures of the ancient Levant” at the École Pratique des Hautes Études in Paris, France. His research and teaching touch on various aspects of Northwest Semitic epigraphy, philology, and the history of Levantine scribal traditions, with a special focus on Ugaritic studies.

Christian W. Hess is assistant at the department of Ancient Near Eastern Studies at the Freie Universität Berlin (Germany). He specializes in the linguistic and literary analysis of Akkadian, in particular the structure and use of the Akkadian literary dialect known as “Standard Babylonian”.

Aaron Koller is professor of Near Eastern and Jewish Studies at Yeshiva University, where he is chair of the Beren Department of Jewish Studies. His is the author of Esther in Ancient Jewish Thought (Cambridge University Press) and Unbinding Isaac: The Akedah in Jewish Thought (JPS/University of Nebraska Press), and numerous studies in Semitic philology. Aaron Koller has served as a visiting professor at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, and held research fellowships at the Albright Institute for Archaeological Research and the Hartman Institute. He lives in Queens, NY with his wife, Shira Hecht‐Koller, and their children.

Antonio Loprieno is Professor of Egyptology at the University of Basel (Switzerland), where he also acted as president from 2006‐2015. His main research foci are on Egyptian and Semitic linguistics, Egyptian literature and higher education leadership.

Craig Melchert is the A. Richard Diebold Emeritus Professor of Indo‐European Studies and Professor of Linguistics at the University of California, Los Angeles. His work focuses on Anatolian Linguistics, including studies on Hittite, Luwian, Lycian, and other Anatolian languages.

Piotr Michalowski is the George G. Cameron Emeritus Professor of Ancient Near Eastern Civilizations at the University of Michigan, where he taught for thirty‐five years. He is the author of numerous articles and books on all aspects of early Mesopotamian cultures, on literature, history, historiography, magic, and languages.

Ludwig Morenz is Professor of Egyptology at the University of Bonn. His research focuses on early Egyptian writing, Ancient Egyptian literature (especially literature of the Middle Kingdom), and ancient Egyptian society.

Matthias Müller is a research associate for Egyptology and Ancient History at the University of Basel (Switzerland). His focus is on Coptic and Ancient Egyptian, although he has also worked on Akkadian and its grammar in texts from Egypt.

Christopher Rollston is Professor of Northwest Semitic Languages and Literatures at George Washington University. His expertise includes Northwest Semitic epigraphy, literacy in the ancient world, ancient scribal practices and scribal education, and the origins and early usages of the alphabet.

Seth Sanders is Professor of Religious Studies at UC Davis and focuses on the Hebrew Bible, Hebrew, and comparative religion. One of his recent projects is a comparison between ancient Babylonian, Hebrew, and Aramaic scholarship.

Thomas Schneider is Professor of Egyptology and Near Eastern Studies at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver. He has published widely on Egyptian interconnections with the Levant and the Near East, Egyptian history and chronology, Egyptian historical phonology, and the history of Egyptology in Nazi Germany.

Christian Stadel is Senior Lecturer in the department of Hebrew language at the Ben‐Gurion University of the Negev (Beer Sheva, Israel). His research focuses on the Aramaic language of various periods, in particular Old and Imperial Aramaic as well as Middle and Late Aramaic dialects such as Qumran Aramaic and Samaritan Aramaic.

Peter Stein is Associate Professor for Semitic Studies working in the Faculties of Theology at the Universities of Jena and Erfurt (Germany). His research focuses on the Arabian Peninsula in Antiquity, in particular on the epigraphic documentation in the Ancient South Arabian languages and in Aramaic.

Jan Tavernier is Professor of Ancient Near Eastern Studies at the Université catholique de Louvain (Belgium). His research focus includes Elamite and Old Iranian linguistics, Ancient Near Eastern (esp. Old Iranian, Akkadian and Elamite) onomastics, and the linguistic history of the Achaemenid Empire.

Juan Pablo Vita is a researcher at the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) in Madrid. He works on Northwest Semitic languages (especially Ugaritic) and Akkadian, in particular peripheral Akkadian dialects such as those from Ugarit and Emar, the Akkadian of the Amarna period (Canaano‐Akkadian), and language contact.

Mark Weeden is Senior Lecturer in Ancient Near Eastern Studies at SOAS, University of London, where he works on and teaches Ancient Near Eastern languages, literature, history, and scribal practices with special focus on Anatolia and Hittite.

Michael Wingert is a Lecturer in the department of Near Eastern Languages and Cultures at the University of California, Los Angeles. His research focus is on the Hebrew and Aramaic biblical traditions, as well as on Iron Age Mesopotamia from a philological, historical, and socio‐linguistic perspective.

Christopher Woods is the John A. Wilson Professor of Sumerian at the University of Chicago and currently the director of the Oriental Institute (Chicago). His research focuses on Sumerian writing and language, as well as early Mesopotamian religion, literature, and mathematics.

Ilya Yakubovich holds research appointments at the Russian Academy of Sciences and the University of Marburg (Germany). His main academic interest is the linguistic and philological study of ancient Indo‐European languages, in particular, those belonging to the Anatolian and Iranian groups. In addition, he made contribution to the study of language contact in ancient societies.

Preface

The current volume serves as an introduction to a representative sample of Ancient Near Eastern languages and language families attested during the time period of roughly 3200 BCE to the second century CE. This time‐frame reflects the time from the beginning of writing (around 3200 BCE) to the end of cuneiform writing in the second century CE. The geographical scope selected reaches from Egypt through the Levant, Anatolia, northern Syria, Mesopotamia, all the way to southern Arabia and thus reflects all major cultures attested in the Ancient Near East during this time period. Although it was impossible to include a description of all languages attested in this wide geographical area throughout more than three millennia due to limitations in space, at least the majority of language families are represented, such as Egyptian, Sumerian, Semitic, Indo‐European, Elamite, and Hurrian.

As the reader will notice, this volume differs in various aspects from other existing overviews of Ancient Near Eastern languages. Although it contains chapters that include grammatical descriptions of individual Ancient Near Eastern languages, the focus of this volume is not so much on the detailed representation of the grammatical features of these languages, but rather on their context within Ancient Near Eastern societies and cultures, that is, on their socio‐linguistic contexts. The language chapters thus also contain sections on language contact and related phenomena whenever it was possible to include such information – in some cases, as for example concerning Amorite, no sufficient data exist for describing such socio‐linguistic features so far. The descriptions of the languages themselves are meant to provide the reader with a general idea of how they looked like and what kind of evidence there is for each of them and should not be taken as a comprehensive overview of the languages’ grammar.

In addition to the chapters on individual languages, the volume includes various sections on socio‐linguistic phenomena such as the use of various languages as administrative languages in the second and first millennia BCE (Akkadian and Aramaic), a section on language contact between various Ancient Near Eastern languages, such as Sumerian and Akkadian, Egyptian and Northwest Semitic, Hebrew and Aramaic, and a general chapter on multilingualism and diglossia in the Ancient Near East. Another section addresses the creation and use of literary languages and the influence of scribal cultures on each other that are attested in the broader Ancient Near East, such as the creation of a literary variant of Egyptian and Akkadian, the literary and scribal influence of Sumerian on Anatolia and the Ancient Near Eastern literary influence on the Hebrew Bible. These chapters are meant to give an introduction to the complex interactions that Ancient Near Eastern societies and cultures, and thus their languages, had with each other. Ancient Near Eastern languages did not exist in a vacuum, as overviews of these languages that solely deal with grammatical descriptions often seem to suggest, but they were in constant contact with each other and thus influenced each other. Although research into Ancient Near Eastern language contact, bilingualism, etc. has become popular in recent years, the field is still in its infancy and much is still unknown which languages or language varieties people in these societies actually spoke and how exactly the languages interacted. This volume attempts to bring together the work of scholars in different sub‐branches of Ancient Near Eastern studies in order to provide a starting point for further research and research questions.

Lastly, four chapters are devoted to the emergence and development of the major writing systems used in the Ancient Near East and the story of their decipherment, including cuneiform writing, Egyptian hieroglyphic writing, and alphabetic writing.

The chapters of the volume are meant to interconnect, but also to serve as ‘stand‐alone’ chapters, meaning they can be read without reference to other chapters in the volume. This approach has resulted in a few minor repetitions between the language and other chapters, which were necessary for the overall concept of the book and which I hope will not detract from the value of each contribution.

I am very thankful to all the contributors who have so graciously lent their time and expertise to making this volume possible, which, I hope, might be of interest to a broad variety of scholars and readers in general. Thanks should also go to the team at Wiley Blackwell for bringing the book to Production.

Rebecca Hasselbach‐Andee
Chicago, December 2019

PART I
WRITING SYSTEMS