Materials for Carbon Capture, I by De-en Jiang

Materials for Carbon Capture

Edited by

 

De‐en Jiang

Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA

 

Shannon M. Mahurin

Chemical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA

 

Sheng Dai

Chemical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA

Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA

 

 

 

 

 

Wiley Logo

Copyright

This edition first published 2020

© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by law. Advice on how to obtain permission to reuse material from this title is available at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.

The right of De‐en Jiang, Shannon M. Mahurin and Sheng Dai to be identified as the authors of the editorial material in this work has been asserted in accordance with law.

Registered Offices

John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA

John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK

Editorial Office

The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK

For details of our global editorial offices, customer services, and more information about Wiley products visit us at www.wiley.com.

Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats and by print‐on‐demand. Some content that appears in standard print versions of this book may not be available in other formats.

Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty

In view of ongoing research, equipment modifications, changes in governmental regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to the use of experimental reagents, equipment, and devices, the reader is urged to review and evaluate the information provided in the package insert or instructions for each chemical, piece of equipment, reagent, or device for, among other things, any changes in the instructions or indication of usage and for added warnings and precautions. While the publisher and authors have used their best efforts in preparing this work, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives, written sales materials or promotional statements for this work. The fact that an organization, website, or product is referred to in this work as a citation and/or potential source of further information does not mean that the publisher and authors endorse the information or services the organization, website, or product may provide or recommendations it may make. This work is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a specialist where appropriate. Further, readers should be aware that websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read. Neither the publisher nor authors shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.

Library of Congress Cataloging‐in‐Publication Data applied for

Hardback ISBN: 9781119091172

Cover Design: Wiley

Cover Image: Courtesy of De‐en Jiang

List of Contributors

  • Ravichandar Babarao
  • Manufacturing Flagship
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
  • Clayton, Victoria
  • Australia
  • and
  • School of Science
  • RMIT University
  • Melbourne, Victoria
  • Australia
  • Tae‐Hyun Bae
  • Singapore Membrane Technology Centre
  • Nanyang Technological University
  • Singapore
  • and
  • School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
  • Nanyang Technological University
  • Singapore
  • Teng Ben
  • Department of Chemistry
  • Jilin University
  • Changchun
  • China
  • Jason E. Bara
  • Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering
  • University of Alabama
  • Tuscaloosa, AL
  • USA
  • Chong Yang Chuah
  • School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
  • Nanyang Technological University
  • Singapore
  • Sheng Dai
  • Chemical Sciences Division
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory
  • TN
  • USA
  • and
  • Department of Chemistry
  • University of Tennessee
  • Knoxville, TN
  • USA
  • Chi‐Linh Do‐Thanh
  • Department of Chemistry
  • University of Tennessee
  • Knoxville, TN
  • USA
  • Xueying Ge
  • Department of Chemistry
  • University of South Florida
  • Tampa, FL
  • USA
  • W. Jeffrey Horne
  • Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering
  • University of Alabama
  • Tuscaloosa, AL
  • USA
  • Kuan Huang
  • Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Environmental and Resources Utilization of Ministry of Education
  • School of Resources Environmental and Chemical Engineering
  • Nanchang University
  • Jiangxi
  • China
  • Aman Jain
  • Manufacturing Flagship
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
  • Clayton, Victoria
  • Australia
  • and
  • Indian Institute of Technology
  • Kanpur Uttar Pradesh
  • India
  • De‐en Jiang
  • Department of Chemistry
  • University of California
  • Riverside, CA
  • USA
  • Siew Siang Lee
  • Singapore Membrane Technology Centre
  • Nanyang Technological University
  • Singapore
  • An‐Hui Lu
  • School of Chemical Engineering
  • State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals
  • Dalian University of Technology
  • China
  • Shengqian Ma
  • Department of Chemistry
  • University of South Florida
  • Tampa, FL
  • USA
  • Shannon M. Mahurin
  • Chemical Sciences Division
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory
  • TN
  • USA
  • Mingguang Pan
  • Department of Chemistry
  • ZJU‐NHU United R&D Center
  • Zhejiang University
  • Hangzhou
  • China
  • Shilun Qiu
  • State Key Laboratory of Inorganic Synthesis and Preparative Chemistry
  • Jilin University
  • Changchun
  • China
  • Jennifer Schott
  • Department of Chemistry
  • University of Tennessee
  • Knoxville, TN
  • USA
  • Ziqi Tian
  • Department of Chemistry
  • University of California
  • Riverside, CA
  • USA
  • Ikuo Taniguchi
  • International Institute for Carbon‐Neutral Energy Research (WPI‐I2CNER)
  • Kyushu University
  • Fukuoka
  • Japan
  • Aaron W. Thornton
  • Manufacturing Flagship
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
  • Clayton, Victoria
  • Australia
  • Congmin Wang
  • Department of Chemistry
  • ZJU‐NHU United R&D Center
  • Zhejiang University
  • Hangzhou
  • China
  • and
  • Key Laboratory of Biomass Chemical Engineering of Ministry of Education
  • Zhejiang University
  • Hangzhou
  • China
  • Rong Wang
  • Singapore Membrane Technology Centre
  • Nanyang Technological University
  • Singapore
  • and
  • School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
  • Nanyang Technological University
  • Singapore
  • Song Wang
  • Department of Chemistry
  • University of California
  • Riverside, CA
  • USA
  • Sunee Wongchitphimon
  • Singapore Membrane Technology Centre
  • Nanyang Technological University
  • Singapore
  • Xiang‐Qian Zhang
  • School of Chemical Engineering
  • State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals
  • Dalian University of Technology
  • China

Preface

Fossil fuels are a relatively inexpensive source of energy, and the combustion of these fuels has enabled significant technological advances, has fostered prosperity, and largely powers the global economy of today. Fossil fuels are used over a broad range of sectors including transportation, the industrial sector, and the generation of electricity. The combustion of fossil fuels, however, results in the emission of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, which leads to negative environmental impacts. Despite the development and growth of renewable energy sources, fossil fuels will continue to play a key part in the energy landscape for the foreseeable future as the global demand for energy continues to grow at an unprecedented rate. Carbon capture, which is a process where carbon dioxide is separated from power plant effluents or industrial processes, offers a technological solution to reduce carbon dioxide emissions while enabling the continued use of fossil fuels. Though carbon capture technologies currently exist, new materials and processes are needed to drive technological advances for more energy‐efficient and cost‐effective separation of carbon dioxide from a mixed gas stream. The importance of this topic is surely reflected in the heightened interest across many sectors including industry.

This book aims to highlight the current state of the art in materials for carbon capture, providing a comprehensive understanding of separations ranging from solid sorbents to liquid sorbents and membranes. The knowledge, expertise, and dedication of the diverse group of contributors have made this book a reality. We feel this book will be helpful to those new to the area of carbon capture, affording an overview of the novel materials currently being explored. Graduate students will find this book useful both as an introduction to the various materials that are on the cutting edge of separations and as a way to expand their fundamental understanding of the separations process. Hopefully, it will also inspire these graduate students and spark their imagination to go beyond the novel materials highlighted in this book and develop new materials with enhanced separations properties. Even experts in the field, experimentalists and theorists alike, will benefit from the diverse and unconventional topics covered in this book. The combined efforts of experts and those new to the field, experimentalists and theorists, scientists and engineers will foster discovery and innovation in carbon capture as well as storage and utilization. We hope that readers of all levels will enjoy this book and discover the wonder of this separations process while also being inspired to contribute their knowledge to a global challenge that affects us all.

Acknowledgments

We are supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division. We are grateful to Sarah Higginbotham and Emma Strickland of Wiley for working with us on the book from proposal to production and to Aruna Pragasam and Adalfin Jayasingh of Wiley for helping us deliver this book. Jianbo Xu helped index the book. We thank all the contributors to this book for their collaboration, time, and patience.

1
Introduction

De‐en Jiang1, Shannon M. Mahurin2, and Sheng Dai2, 3

1 Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA

2 Chemical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA

3 Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA

Burning fossil fuels for electricity and transportation has led to steadily increasing CO2 levels in the atmosphere, as recorded in the Keeling curve [1], and, consequently, global warming. This concern has become a major driving force for a larger share of renewable energy in power generation and for electrifying transportation. However, coal‐fired and natural gas‐fired power plants have a long lifetime, which makes post‐combustion carbon capture necessary. In addition, pre‐combustion carbon capture will be an important part of clean‐coal technology. Removal of CO2 from natural gas is also important, especially given the shale‐gas boom. Moreover, direct air capture of CO2 has also been explored by many, since there is already a large amount of emitted CO2 in the air. Hence, carbon capture and storage (CCS) is important for mitigating global warming and climate change [2].

Novel materials hold the key to energy‐efficient carbon capture. As a frontier research area, carbon capture has been a major driving force behind many materials technologies. This book aims to present an overview of the advances in materials research for carbon capture, beyond the commercial amine‐based solvent‐sorption technologies. Broadly speaking, carbon‐capture materials can be divided into two categories: sorbents and membranes. Common sorbents are high‐surface‐area porous materials, such as zeolites, metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs), covalent‐organic frameworks (COFs), and amorphous porous carbonaceous materials. Membranes are mainly of the polymeric type, while inorganic, carbonaceous, and mixed‐matrix membranes (MMMs) are being actively explored.

MOFs are promising large‐capacity adsorbents for CO2 due to their great chemical tunability in controlling the pore size, pore shape and topology, metal‐site chemistry, and linker functional groups [3]. In Chapter 2, Ge and Ma present an overview of the MOF materials for carbon capture, focusing on the correlation between MOF structure and CO2 uptake and tabulating the best‐performing MOFs; they also briefly discuss pure MOF membranes and MOF‐containing mixed‐matrix‐membranes.

One weakness limiting the application of many MOFs in capturing CO2 from water‐vapor‐saturated flue gas is their sensitivity to moisture. Porous carbonaceous materials, on the other hand, are both chemically and thermally stable. They are usually made from pyrolysis of a carbon‐atom‐containing precursor that can be either a polymer or a small molecule [4]. At the high‐temperature‐treatment end (∼900 °C or higher), the carbon content is high (>90 mol%), and the resulting materials are just called porous carbons. In Chapter 3, Zhang and Lu review the different approaches to make porous carbons, from the perspectives of templates and precursors, and their performances for carbon capture as adsorbents.

Ben, Qiu, and their workers have pioneered the design and synthesis of a different type of porous carbonaceous materials called porous aromatic frameworks (PAFs), which can be visualized by replacing all the CC bonds in the diamond with groups such as the biphenyl, leading to a material with a huge surface area of over 5000 m2 g−1 [5]. PAFs have generated a lot of interest as a material platform for gas storage and separation. In Chapter 4, Ben and Qiu review PAFs for carbon capture and strategies for their further improvement.

Computational modeling and virtual screening are playing an increasingly important role in materials discovery for catalysts, batteries, thermoelectrics, and topological phases, to name a few. So carbon capture is not an exception. In Chapter 5, Jain, Babarao, and Thornton comprehensively review the computational methods, candidate materials, and criteria for virtual screening of materials as membranes and sorbents for carbon capture. Moreover, they show the physical insights that can be gained from computational modeling in understanding the many factors that come into play.

In Chapter 6, Jiang and workers further summarize the advances in using computational modeling to guide the development of ultrathin membranes based on 2D materials such as graphene for gas separations. Interlayer‐spacing tuning exhibits great potential in control of molecular and ionic transport in 2D membranes [6–8]. The field of 2D membranes for gas separations was to a large extent initiated by the original proof of concept of one‐atom‐thin membranes for gas separations by Jiang et al. [9]. In this chapter, they review the progress made both experimentally and computationally in this field since their original work in 2009, focusing on the computational aspects for guiding future experimental developments.

Polymeric membranes are commercially used for gas separations and water desalination [10]. Their performances are limited by a trade‐off between selectivity and permeability called the Robeson upper bound [11]. In Chapter 7, Bara and Horne review the polymeric membranes for CO2 separation for different types of polymers; they also briefly touch upon facilitated transport and membrane contactors. In Chapter 8, Huang and Dai present an overview of carbon‐based membranes for CO2 separation.

Increasing materials complexity has been a key driver in recent advances in membrane separations to leverage both interactions and transport via different components and building blocks of the composite materials [12]. The complexity built in the composite materials supplies a large space of imagination for use‐inspired fundamental studies via mixing and matching of materials, a point emphasized in a special issue of Science (2 November 2018). In the context of gas separations, the best example is the MMMs [13]. Strategies in designing MMMs to overcome the upper bound include the use of nano‐sized or nanosheet‐shaped molecular sieving fillers with a polymer and the elimination of the interfacial gaps [10]. In Chapter 9, Bae and coworkers review composite materials for carbon capture in terms of both adsorbents and membranes. Dendrimers provide a different approach toward materials complexity. In Chapter 10, Taniguchi discusses how poly(amidoamine) dendrimers can be used for carbon capture.

Ionic liquids (ILs) as a nonvolatile but versatile medium have attracted great interest in the areas of separations, energy storage, and catalysis, among others. Advanced ionic systems, such as confined ionic liquids [14], poly(ionic liquid)s [15], and porous ionic polymers [16] offer many opportunities in utilizing the long‐range Coulombic interaction to tune the structure and assembly of the molecular building blocks that impact molecular/ionic transport in either a sorbent [17] or a membrane setup [18,19]. In Chapter 11, Pan and Wang summarize the recent advances in using ionic liquids for chemisorption of CO2, while in Chapter 12, Mahurin and coworkers review IL‐based membranes for CO2 separation.

In sum, this book is aimed at presenting to the reader the latest advances in the materials aspect of carbon capture, drawing from the contributors' expertise. This field is still quickly advancing, driven by the urgent need to mitigate carbon emissions. Although there are still developments that are not covered in the following 11 chapters, we hope that they do present some of the most important classes of materials currently being pursued for carbon capture.

References

  1. 1 Scripps Institution of Oceanography. (2019).The Keeling Curve. https://scripps.ucsd.edu/programs/keelingcurve (accessed 27 May 2019).
  2. 2 Bui, M., Adjiman, C.S., Bardow, A. et al. (2018). Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward. Energy & Environmental Science 11: 1062.
  3. 3 Yu, J.M., Xie, L.H., Li, J.R. et al. (2017). CO2 capture and separations using MOFs: computational and experimental studies. Chemical Reviews 117: 9674.
  4. 4 Zhai, Y., Dou, Y., Zhao, D. et al. (2011). Carbon materials for chemical capacitive energy storage. Advanced Materials 23: 4828.
  5. 5 Ben, T., Ren, H., Ma, S. et al. (2009). Targeted synthesis of a porous aromatic framework with high stability and exceptionally high surface area. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 48: 9457.
  6. 6 Sun, P.Z., Wang, K.L., and Zhu, H.W. (2016). Recent developments in graphene‐based membranes: structure, mass‐transport mechanism and potential applications. Advanced Materials 28: 2287.
  7. 7 Wang, L.D., Boutilier, M.S.H., Kidambi, P.R. et al. (2017). Fundamental transport mechanisms, fabrication and potential applications of nanoporous atomically thin membranes. Nature Nanotechnology 12: 509.
  8. 8 Zheng, S.X., Tu, Q.S., Urban, J.J. et al. (2017). Swelling of graphene oxide membranes in aqueous solution: characterization of interlayer spacing and insight into water transport mechanisms. ACS Nano 11: 6440.
  9. 9 Jiang, D.E., Cooper, V.R., and Dai, S. (2009). Porous graphene as the ultimate membrane for gas separation. Nano Letters 9: 4019.
  10. 10 Park, H.B., Kamcev, J., Robeson, L.M. et al. (2017). Maximizing the right stuff: the trade‐off between membrane permeability and selectivity. Science 356: eaab0530.
  11. 11 Robeson, L.M. (2008). The upper bound revisited. Journal of Membrane Science 320: 390.
  12. 12 Koros, W.J. and Zhang, C. (2017). Materials for next‐generation molecularly selective synthetic membranes. Nature Materials 16: 289.
  13. 13 Dechnik, J., Gascon, J., Doonan, C.J. et al. (2017). Mixed‐matrix membranes. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 56: 9292.
  14. 14 Zhang, S.G., Zhang, J.H., Zhang, Y., and Deng, Y.Q. (2017). Nanoconfined ionic liquids. Chemical Reviews 117: 6755.
  15. 15 Qian, W.J., Texter, J., and Yan, F. (2017). Frontiers in poly(ionic liquid)s: syntheses and applications. Chemical Society Reviews 46: 1124.
  16. 16 Xu, D., Guo, J.N., and Yan, F. (2018). Porous ionic polymers: design, synthesis, and applications. Progress in Polymer Science 79: 121.
  17. 17 Zeng, S.J., Zhang, X., Bai, L.P. et al. (2017). Ionic‐liquid‐based CO2 capture systems: structure, interaction and process. Chemical Reviews 117: 9625.
  18. 18 Dai, Z.D., Noble, R.D., Gin, D.L. et al. (2016). Combination of ionic liquids with membrane technology: a new approach for CO2 separation. Journal of Membrane Science 497: 1.
  19. 19 Tome, L.C. and Marrucho, I.M. (2016). Ionic liquid‐based materials: a platform to design engineered CO2 separation membranes. Chemical Society Reviews 45: 2785.