Denise (Dee) Campbell
MA, PgDip, BSc, RM, RN, FHEA
Principal Lecturer and Programme Tutor in
Midwifery (retired)
University of Hertfordshire
Hatfield, UK
Susan M. Carr
MA, PgCert, BSc, RM, RN, FHEA
Principal Lecturer and Programme Leader in Midwifery
University of Hertfordshire
Hatfield, UK
Series editor:
Ian Peate OBE, FRCN
This edition first published 2018
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by law. Advice on how to obtain permission to reuse material from this title is available at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
The right of Denise (Dee) Campbell and Susan M Carr to be identified as the authors of this work has been asserted in accordance with law.
Registered Offices:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester,
West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
Editorial Office:
9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK
For details of our global editorial offices, customer services, and more information about Wiley products visit us at www.wiley.com.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats and by print-on-demand. Some content that appears in standard print versions of this book may not be available in other formats.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty
The contents of this work are intended to further general scientific research, understanding, and discussion only and are not intended and should not be relied upon as recommending or promoting scientific method, diagnosis, or treatment by physicians for any particular patient. In view of ongoing research, equipment modifications, changes in governmental regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to the use of medicines, equipment, and devices, the reader is urged to review and evaluate the information provided in the package insert or instructions for each medicine, equipment, or device for, among other things, any changes in the instructions or indication of usage and for added warnings and precautions. While the publisher and authors have used their best efforts in preparing this work, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives, written sales materials or promotional statements for this work. The fact that an organisation, website, or product is referred to in this work as a citation and/or potential source of further information does not mean that the publisher and authors endorse the information or services the organisation, website, or product may provide or recommendations it may make. This work is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a specialist where appropriate. Further, readers should be aware that websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read. Neither the publisher nor authors shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Campbell, Denise, 1961– author. | Carr, Susan M. (Susan Mary), 1954– author.
Title: Midwifery emergencies at a glance / by Denise (Dee) Campbell, Susan M. Carr.
Description: Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2018. | Series: At a glance series |
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
Identifiers: LCCN 2018015376 (print) | LCCN 2018015920 (ebook) | ISBN
9781119138020 (pdf) | ISBN 9781119138044 (epub) | ISBN 9781119138013 (pbk.)
Subjects: | MESH: Obstetric Labor Complications | Midwifery | Emergency
Treatment—methods | Handbooks
Classification: LCC RG571 (ebook) | LCC RG571 (print) | NLM WQ 165 | DDC
618.2/025—dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018015376
Cover image: © Natalia Deriabina/Getty Images
Cover design by Wiley
Statement 15 of The Code (Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2015) reminds us that a midwife ‘must always offer help if an emergency arises in the practice setting or anywhere else' – the expectation is one of competent assessment and prompt actions in response to an obstetric or neonatal emergency. The intention of this book is to provide clear guidance on the factors which predispose to complications, so that preventative management can be employed whenever possible. Moreover, it should provide a concise, ordered overview which clearly directs the midwife through the management of an emergency in the specific order that the skills will be required. This is a resource that is intended to help guide the development of essential skills, but also to support the revision and maintenance of the skills during continuing professional development. In addition, many emergency situations may require additional, associated skills and so many of these are also included in this book. These may be useful in assisting in the progress of emergency management or to provide further review, screening or diagnostics.
The need to comply with the ‘At A Glance' style, with chapters typically reduced to a double page, has presented its challenges. As midwifery lecturers, we have struggled to omit aspects that have previously been fundamental to our teaching sessions, such as the physiology behind the emergency and the evidence behind a particular management approach. We have had to reduce the detail to essentials only and become as succinct as was necessary. The result is a very pleasing, simple and clearly written guide, which gets straight to the heart of the skill, just as these books are intended to do. In addition, a page of varied figures provides additional information and/or improved clarity in a visual form. Its simplicity makes it a very useful tool – progressing directly to the specific management of the emergency.
For those with questioning minds who wish to increase their background knowledge, we have included, for your own analysis, many of the references that guide the management. Plus, the website contains the fully expanded answers to the multiple choice questions as not all the answers are to be found within the text – we hope this will encourage further reading.
This book is written predominantly with the midwife in mind –both for the student and for those already qualified. However, it would also support the education and continuing development of medical students, junior doctors, general practitioners and paramedics – any of whom may find themselves initiating emergency midwifery, obstetric or neonatal care.
This book is intended to inform and educate practitioners about the management of emergencies and the many associated skills. These emergencies may happen in a range of settings from fully equipped and staffed obstetric units to the stand-alone unit or homebirth. The practitioner has a professional responsibility to meet the standards necessary and to become so familiar with these skills that they can adapt them to any setting. They must be able to team work effectively and appropriately manage all the help available. In an ideal situation, the emergency will be supported by a full obstetric, paediatric, anaesthetic and operative team as required, with additional support from haematology, pathology, microbiology, blood bank, pharmacy and porters. When the practitioner is alone they must simultaneously initiate emergency management and call for assistance.
This chapter cannot cover all professional responsibilities associated with emergency management. It will concentrate on the need to achieve and maintain professional standards, continue professional development, maintain a high standard of record keeping, and show awareness of accountability.
The standards of clinical expertise achieved by midwives are controlled by a number of training and monitoring processes. This begins at the interview and admission stage to midwifery training. The profession is looking not only for those academically able, but also for those whose personalities and ethical stance will enhance the profession and improve standards of care. Service users, clinicians, and midwifery tutors jointly decide on the selection approach to be used and which candidates have met these exacting standards. All training programmes align with stringent Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC, 2009) guidelines and are variously quality monitored throughout (see Figure 1.1). The aim is to achieve clinical competency at the point of qualifying (alongside the skills of life-long learning).
With employment there comes a period of preceptorship (support, monitoring, and development). This is followed by regular employer and professional body review with standards monitored against local policies, as well as professional standards such as: The Code (NMC, 2015) (see Figure 1.2); Standards to support learning and assessment in practice (NMC, 2008) (see Figure 1.3); Standards of medicine management (NMC, 2007) (see Figure 1.4); Standards for competence for registered midwives (NMC, 2011) (see Figure 1.5); and, in addition, a great number of local hospital protocols. Periodic Revalidation (NMC, 2017) is required and this can only be met through a combination of clinical experience and continuing professional development (CPD) (see Figure 1.6).
In order to perform within expected standards of care, the professional has a duty to maintain skill competencies and knowledge levels. The process of Revalidation ensures that midwives engage in CPD, but most midwives will surpass any minimum levels set.
Midwives should maintain critical awareness of:
They must attend clinical skills updates including:
A high standard of contemporaneous record keeping has long been understood to be an essential component of good practice. The NMC (2015) provides midwives with guidance on the principles of good record keeping. Yet, it can remain an issue during complaints investigations and is often included as a development requirement during supervised practice. During an emergency, record keeping becomes both a greater challenge and a greater necessity. Best practice would allocate the role of scribe to an individual best suited to the role – someone sufficiently experienced to know the important elements to include. Alongside this it requires:
Accountability is the taking of responsibility for ones own actions and ability to defend decision making. The professional may be questioned at any time (often years after an event) by a client, employer, professional regulatory body, or through a legal challenge. The professional is judged on whether they performed to the expected standard of care. This is based on the normal standards of professional practice typical at the time of the event. Expectations are also individualised to the circumstances of the incident and are expected to encompass:
Communication is considered to be a two-way interaction in which information is both given and received. This interaction is not only about the content of the communication but also about the process itself and the context in which it is being delivered (see Boxes 2.1 and 2.2). Communication is made up of verbal and non-verbal cues and is not a simple message exchange. It includes not only what is said but also how it is said (intonation), alongside the body language that accompanies it. Then, interpretation of the message by the recipient is influenced by numerous factors including: their own life-experience; knowledge level; socio-cultural issues; health and emotional state; disability; and the environment in which it is received. At the time of an emergency, there also may be anxiety, pain, shock, and fear to interfere with effective listening. Numerous heightened emotions will impact on both sides of the communication.
Informed consent may be gained verbally, in writing, and through the actions of the individual conveying consent. In some emergency situations, aspects of consent may have been gained even before the emergency occurred, for example gaining permission to use an oxytocic drug should a woman begin to haemorrhage. However, in most situations the emergency is unpredictable, unexpected, and the pace of change makes informed consent a challenge.
Achieving a holistic approach to communications between the professionals and the women they care for throughout an emergency is challenging. Whilst keeping the woman informed and gaining consent remain a priority, there are now multiple professionals involved (see Box 2.3) and time is limited. The priority for care becomes the management of the immediate emergency and associated pathophysiology. The concentration will be on emergency practical skills and interprofessional communications to achieve optimal outcomes (see Boxes 2.4 and 2.5). Additionally, the woman may be tired, medicated, frightened, and in pain, which affects her capacity to understand, retain information, appreciate the implications, and communicate her opinions (as expected by the Mental Capacity Act, 2005). All aspects of the management must be directed in the best interests of the woman.
This is not about underestimating the role of communication in general and informed consent in particular. It is about how much more challenging communications become in situations of uncertain outcomes, time limits, and rapidly changing management. It becomes essential that a member of the team takes the role of staying at the head of the bed, with the woman. They should explain and interpret events at an appropriate level. The speed at which the emergency management progresses may not always allow detailed explanations of evidence, discussions, and time for questions, but the essentials must still be applied, and the views of the woman passed back to the team. Communications should include full awareness of body language, good listening skills, and the ability to balance appropriately the information shared in the time available.
It is important that there is a full appreciation of how information is shared. Beware of using unfamiliar words without explaining their meaning, and appreciate that it is not only ‘what is said’ that portrays a message. Even the most skilful professional can unintentionally communicate through negative intonation or body language.
Be prepared for questions and anxiety. A balance is required between appropriate levels of honesty and realistic reassurances, without making guarantees that may not be achievable. Whilst some information needs to be shared immediately, the full extent of the problem in an emergency can only be determined retrospectively. Therefore, in most cases it is advisable to keep ongoing explanations simple, gaining permission to concentrate on the management of the emergency as the priority, but also giving reassurances that a full explanation of events will follow. This enables a full understanding of the concern to be known, and prevents the early sharing of misleading information (when the emergency may still change, reduce, or escalate). It also allows the woman time to digest the problem and begin to recover from the physical management and emotional shock associated with it.
Following a traumatic episode such as an obstetric or neonatal emergency, adrenaline levels are raised and the woman may be in a state of further anxiety and stress. These are normal responses which will resolve naturally for the majority of women. It is important to appreciate that involvement in an emergency does not typically lead to a lasting stress disorder. Communications following the emergency are not intended as a debriefing exercise, particularly as evidence suggests a single-session may do more harm than good (Bastos et al., 2015). Communications after an emergency are an opportunity to discuss the event in more detail, allow questions, then clarify any misunderstandings following a basic explanation of the emergency and its management. The woman must feel comfortable and be able to discuss aspects openly. Rather than a one-sided commentary by the professional, there should be a two-way conversation that fulfils the needs of the woman.
It is important to appreciate personal limitations and to not cross professional boundaries. Be honest about the limits of your expertise and involve the specialist or more senior practitioners in explanations of their role, as required. This is particularly relevant when breaking bad news – you may need to arrange for a more experienced, senior or specialist colleague to join you during the information sharing.
Every woman will have a different reaction to an emergency; there may be any number of aspects affecting her ability to assimilate information. Emotions can be affected by, for example, being in a postoperative state, in pain, sleep deprived, or hormonal. Cultural, ethnic, and social issues may also affect responses. It is important that any reactions to communications from you are received non-judgementally. It may be appropriate for you to offer to invite the husband/partner to attend and be available to answer any further questions once they have arrived.
At the end of the discussion, you should explain the care pathway and ongoing management that, with her consent, will follow the emergency. This should include specific information on:
A maternal death is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), as the death of a woman during pregnancy or up to 6 weeks postpartum as a result of conditions associated with, or made worse by, pregnancy (WHO, 2010). In the UK between 2011 and 2013, there were 214 maternal deaths, of which 69 were attributed to ‘direct’ causes such as amniotic fluid embolism, haemorrhage, sepsis, and thromboembolic disorders (Knight et al., 2015). The remaining 145 women died as a result of indirect causes. While the need to resuscitate a young, fit, healthy woman is an increasingly rare occurrence, maternal collapse can and does happen and the outcome is dependent on effective and prompt action by those caring for her. Approximately 50% of maternal deaths are due to preventable and, therefore, treatable causes; the fact that the need to resuscitate a pregnant or recently delivered woman is a rarity suggests that regular drills for midwives and obstetricians should be undertaken if an individual’s skills are to be maintained at a high standard.
Thus, the definition of maternal resuscitation is the support of a woman’s life in the event of sudden collapse accompanied by apnoea and/or cardiac arrest.
The systems of the woman’s body adapt during pregnancy and therefore it is essential that these are understood so that effective resuscitation can take place (see Table 3.1).
This is an emergency. It is essential to note that a woman who is not responding and whose breathing is abnormal is experiencing a cardiac arrest requiring early intervention and resuscitation. The sequence of interventions is as follows (Resuscitation Council (UK) 2015):
If the woman is breathing, place her in the recovery position and call for help. Do not leave her and reassess the situation regularly.
Note: If more than one rescuer is present, alternate roles every 2 minutes to prevent fatigue, ensuring minimum delay during changeovers.
Following completion of the resuscitation, contemporaneous notes of the event must be completed, as well as an incident report form as per NHS Trust protocol. All present, including the parents, may require time to be debriefed.