Details

<b>Preface</b> <p><b>Introduction</b></p> <p><b>SECTION I: THE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF FORENSIC SCIENCE</b></p> <p>1 (1) - 1960 Criminal aspects of forensic science in Great Britain</p> <p>4 (2) - 1964 Forensic science or sciences?</p> <p>4 (4) - 1964 Shriving a science</p> <p>5 (1) - 1965 A public image</p> <p>5 (2) - 1965 Don’t forget them in Swahililand</p> <p>6 (2) - 1966 The vacant headquarters</p> <p>9 (2a) - 1969 Six just men</p> <p>9 (2b) - 1969 “A forensic scientist?”</p> <p>13 (3) - 1973 I hold every man a debtor to his profession</p> <p>14 (2) - 1974 Police perimeters – politics or planning</p> <p>17 (4) - 1977 Theory and practice</p> <p>20 (3) - 1980 Forensic Science – a broader basis</p> <p>21 (1) - 1981 General practice in forensic science</p> <p>24 (6) - 1984 Does forensic science have a future?</p> <p>24 (6) - 1985 Does forensic science have a future?</p> <p>25 (1) - 1985 But is it anything?</p> <p>25 (1) - 1985 But is it anything?</p> <p>25 (5) - 1985 Towards expert experts</p> <p>26 (2) - 1986 Doctrine, Science, Belief, Evidence</p> <p>26 (4) - 1986 The Forensic Science Society – a way forward?</p> <p>26 (5) - 1986 All systems go?</p> <p>27 (2) - 1987 Police productivity</p> <p>29 (1) - 1989 Professional qualifications – a milestone</p> <p>30 (5) - 1990 Brave New World</p> <p>31 (2) - 1991 “Come forth into the light of things, let nature be your teacher”</p> <p>31 (4) - 1991 Forensic science on the quality track</p> <p>32 (2) - 1992 But is this being professional?</p> <p>32 (4) - 1992 Can we help you, sir?</p> <p>33 (3) - 1993 Is this where the buck stops?</p> <p>34 (1) - 1994 An expert what?</p> <p>34 (2) - 1994 Quo vadis?</p> <p>35 (1) - 1995 Does forensic science give value for money?</p> <p>35 (3) - 1995 Rensacor</p> <p>35 (4) - 1995 Lest we forget</p> <p>36 (3) - 1996 Forensic futurology</p> <p>36 (4) - 1996 Ambivalence – a problem for forensic science</p> <p>37 (1) - 1997 Private or public</p> <p>37 (3) - 1997 Jobs for the boys</p> <p>38 (1) - 1998 Proactive forensic science</p> <p>38 (4) - 1998 SOP or CPD, place your bets</p> <p>39 (1) - 1999 Forensic apartheid?</p> <p>39 (2) - 1999 Let me through, I’m a ummmm <i>. . .</i></p> <p>39 (3) - 1999 Something nasty hiding <i>. . .</i></p> <p>39 (4) - 1999 From Bach to Schoenberg</p> <p>42 (2) - 2002 A professional body for forensic scientists</p> <p>45 (1) - 2005 Professionalism – duties and privileges</p> <p>45 (3) - 2005 Who guards the guards?</p> <p>45 (4) - 2005 Everything changes and nothing is constant</p> <p>47 (2) - 2007 Eight years on</p> <p>47 (2) - 2007 Eight years on – Regulation of Forensic Physicians and the CRFP</p> <p>47 (3) - 2007 CPD, an effective means of professional development<i>. . .</i>or is it?</p> <p>48 (1) - 2008 President of the Forensic Science Society</p> <p>48 (3) - 2008 The forensic science regulator</p> <p><b>SECTION II: SCIENTIFIC DEVELOPMENTS AND RESEARCH</b></p> <p>2 (2) - 1961 The individuality of human bloodstaining</p> <p>3 (1) - 1962 A breakthrough in forensic science</p> <p>4 (1) - 1963 Driving over the level</p> <p>4 (1) - 1963 Science before the fact</p> <p>5 (4b) - 1964 The price of road safety</p> <p>6 (1) - 1965 Progress in research</p> <p>7 (4) - 1966 Demanding scientific evidence</p> <p>9 (4) - 1968 Computer control</p> <p>11 (2) - 1971 The defeat of the tail-gater</p> <p>11 (3) - 1971 The New Zealand approach</p> <p>14 (1) - 1974 Back to basics</p> <p>16 (3b) - 1976 An independent witness required</p> <p>19 (4) - 1979 Publish or perish</p> <p>22 (2) - 1982 But is it science <i>. . .</i></p> <p>22 (3) - 1982 Hair today <i>. . .</i></p> <p>25 (2) - 1985 On body fluid frequencies</p> <p>26 (1) - 1986 Publish or perish revisited</p> <p>27 (1) - 1987 Through the looking glass</p> <p>29 (6) - 1989 The highest order common sense</p> <p>30 (1) - 1990 Profile of the Nineties</p> <p>30 (6) - 1990 Official publications</p> <p>33 (4) - 1993 DNA or Abracadabra</p> <p>36 (1) - 1996 To research or capitulate?</p> <p>36 (2) - 1996 Fireproof DNA?</p> <p>37 (4) - 1997 Where will all the forensic scientists go?</p> <p>40 (1) - 2000 Wizards and gatekeepers at the roadside?</p> <p>40 (3) - 2000 The consent of the governed</p> <p>41 (1) - 2001 The use of material from the dead in forensic science research: is it lawful and is it ethical?</p> <p>43 (1) - 2003 Hunting truffles</p> <p>44 (1) - 2004 Reiterative justice?</p> <p>45 (2) - 2005 Science & Justice – DNA and the courts</p> <p>47 (4) - 2007 DNA – what’s next?</p> <p>48 (4) - 2008 Do we value research?</p> <p>49 (1) - 2009 Lessons from the past</p> <p>49 (2) - 2009 IRMS</p> <p><b>SECTION III: EVALUATION AND INTERPRETATION OF EVIDENCE</b></p> <p>19 (3) - 1979 Away with the fuzz</p> <p>23 (1) - 1983 Patience</p> <p>23 (1a) - 1983 Statistics and forensic science – a fruitful partnership</p> <p>23 (1b) - 1983 The probability of exclusion or likelihood of guilt of an accused: Paternity</p> <p>23 (1c) - 1983 The probability of non-discrimination or likelihood of guilt of an accused: Criminal Identification</p> <p>23 (1d) - 1983 What is the probability that this blood came from that person? A meaningful question?</p> <p>23 (1e) - 1983 A frame of reference or Garbage in, Garbage out</p> <p>23 (4) - 1983 On circumstantial evidence</p> <p>26 (3) - 1986 Evaluation of associative physical evidence</p> <p>26 (3a) - 1987 The use of statistics in forensic science.</p> <p>26 (3b) - 1987 The use of statistics in forensic science.</p> <p>28 (3) - 1988 Heads we win</p> <p>37 (2) - 1997 Does justice require less precision than chemistry?</p> <p>43 (2) - 2003 Sally Clark – a lesson for us all</p> <p>44 (2) - 2004 Context-free forensic science</p> <p>46 (1) - 2006 Lies, damn lies and statistics</p> <p><b>SECTION IV: EDUCATION IN FORENSIC SCIENCES</b></p> <p>2 (1) - 1961 Research and teaching in forensic science</p> <p>2 (1) - 1961 A preliminary survey of education and research in the forensic sciences in the United Kingdom</p> <p>9 (1&2) - 1968 Education in forensic science</p> <p>11 (1) - 1971 What is the future for the study and practice of the forensic sciences in Britain?</p> <p>16 (2) - 1976 The Greeks had a word for it</p> <p>44 (4) - 2004 Wither academic forensic science?</p> <p>48 (2) - 2008 Educating the next generation</p> <p>48 (4) - 2008 Educating the next generation.</p> <p>48 (4) - 2008 Educating the next generation.</p> <p>49 (1) - 2009 Educating the next generation.</p> <p><b>SECTION V: FORENSIC SCIENCE AND THE LAW</b></p> <p>1 (2) - 1960 An expert witness looks at the courts</p> <p>3 (2) - 1962 The design of law courts</p> <p>6 (4) - 1965 Bowlers, brollies and bi-focals</p> <p>8 (1) - 1967 The expert witness</p> <p>8 (2) - 1967 Two encouraging cases</p> <p>10 (1) - 1970 Law and order</p> <p>12 (2) - 1972 There is a time to speak</p> <p>12 (3) - 1972 Not Pygmalion likely</p> <p>12 (4) - 1972 Where have all the lawyers gone?</p> <p>13 (2) - 1973 An honest opinion</p> <p>15 (3) - 1975 Modern times</p> <p>16 (3a) - 1976 A camel is a horse<i>. . .</i></p> <p>17 (2&3) - 1977 The four letter swear word</p> <p>18 (3&4) - 1978 Not for the faint hearted</p> <p>19 (2) - 1979 Preliminary hearings – just or unjust – justified or unjustified</p> <p>20 (2) - 1980 The canons of expertise</p> <p>24 (2) - 1984 Have you heard the one about <i>. . . . . .</i></p> <p>24 (5) - 1984 Master or servant?</p> <p>25 (4) - 1985 Don’t Panic</p> <p>27 (4) - 1987 Philosophy and obligations of a state-funded forensic science laboratory</p> <p>27 (5) - 1987 Answers are easy</p> <p>29 (2) - 1989 Science and law, a marriage of opposites</p> <p>34 (3) - 1994 The image of the scientist and the lawyer</p> <p>38 (2) - 1998 The role of the forensic scientist in an inquisitorial system of justice</p> <p>40 (2) - 2000 And what of the evidence!</p> <p>41 (3) - 2001 The boundaries of expert evidence</p> <p>41 (4) - 2001 Reform of the criminal justice system in England and Wales</p> <p>42 (3) - 2002 Justice in a goldfish bowl</p> <p>42 (4) - 2002 Gristle in the sausage<i>. . .</i></p> <p>43 (3) - 2003 Coroners – what next for death investigation in England and Wales?</p> <p>44 (3) - 2004 The Human Tissue Bill – an opportunity about to be missed?</p> <p>46 (2) - 2006 All’s fair in love and war</p> <p><b>SECTION VI: FORENSIC MEDICINE</b></p> <p>5 (4a) - 1964 The smallest room but one</p> <p>7 (3) - 1966 Decline and fall</p> <p>10 (3) - 1970 How much specialisation in pathology can we afford?</p> <p>12 (1) - 1972 “The six-and-a-half-year itch”</p> <p>13 (4) - 1973 For action this day</p> <p>14 (4) - 1974 Chair legs wanted</p> <p>15 (2) - 1975 That muddy field</p> <p>16 (1) - 1976 A national medico-legal service for Scotland</p> <p>19 (1) - 1979 Sudden death of British nationals abroad – problem for pathologists, coroners and relatives</p> <p>41 (2) - 2001 “Best value” in forensic pathology</p> <p>42 (1) - 2002 Herding cats</p> <p><b>SECTION VII: AN INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY OF FORENSIC SCIENCE</b></p> <p>9 (3) - 1968 Another Academy</p> <p>15 (4) - 1975 International co-operation in forensic science</p> <p>17 (1) - 1977 Crime in the cornfields</p> <p>23 (2) - 1983 Reaching out</p> <p>24 (1) - 1984 1984 and all that</p> <p>27 (3) - 1987 Forensic science and the justice system in the late Twentieth Century</p> <p>29 (4) - 1989 Echoes of Empire</p> <p>30 (2) - 1990 A matter of choice</p> <p>30 (4) - 1990 They threatened its life with a railway share</p> <p>38 (3) - 1998 International forensic science</p> <p>40 (4) - 2000 Courts, politicians and constitutions</p> <p>46 (3) - 2006 It’s a big World out there</p> <p><b>Index</b></p>

<p><strong>Dr. Niamh Nic Daéid</strong> has over 20 years experience as a forensic scientist and expert witness.?Her specialist areas include fire investigation, drug analysis and the statistical and Bayesian evaluation and evidence. She has published and delivered over 80 research papers and presentations in international journals and at conferences. She is a lead assessor for CRFP and a member of a number of ENFSI working groups.?Her current areas of research include drug profiling, fire investigation and the statistical interpretation of data.

Over the last half century, the science and practice of forensic science has undergone dramatic changes. Since the early 1960s the technological developments and their application to forensic science have been immense. Not only that, the application of science within a legal context and framework has developed enormously, as has the evaluation of the analytical results obtained. This unique text will look at the changes and challenges within forensic science over the last fifty years through a continuous diary of development witnessed by the editorials and relevant correspondence delivered through the UK Forensic Science Societies’ journal <i>Science and Justice</i> (formally the <i>Journal of the Forensic Science Society</i>). <p>The editorials are divided into sections relating to the developments of forensic practice, the advancement of science, education, legal aspects, forensic science and medicine, the international dimension of forensic science and the interpretation and evaluation of evidence. The text and first two sections are set in context by an introductory chapter written by Professor Brian Caddy examining the future of forensic science.</p> <ul> <li><b>A key text that traces the historical development of forensic science through reflective editorials published in the journal</b> <b><i>Science and Justice,</i></b> <b>and the</b> <b><i>Journal of the Forensic</i></b> <b><i>Science Society</i></b></li> <li><b>Includes introductory chapter by Professor Brian Caddy</b></li> <li><b>Divided into themed sections to reflect current commentary and debate</b></li> </ul>

GB