Cover Page

Bio-Pigmentation and Biotechnological Implementations

 

Edited by

 

Om V. Singh

Division of Biological and Health Sciences
University of Pittsburgh, Bradford, PA, USA

 

 

 

 

 

Wiley Logo

The editor gratefully dedicates this book to Daisaku Ikeda, Uday V. Singh, and Indu Bala in appreciation for their encouragement.

List of Contributors

  1. Wan Azlina Ahmad, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia
  2. P. Akilandeswari, Department of Microbiology, Karpagam University (Karpagam Academy of Higher Education), Tamil Nadu, India
  3. Alberto Alcázar, Department of Investigation, Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
  4. Claira Arul Aruldass, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia
  5. Di Chen, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, China
  6. Cristina Cid, Microbial Evolution Laboratory, Center for Astrobiology (CSIC-INTA), Torrejón de Ardoz, Spain
  7. Laurent Dufossé, Laboratoire de Chimie des Substances Naturelles et des Sciences des Aliments, ESIROI Agroalimentaire, University of La Réunion, Ile de La Réunion, France
  8. Eva García-López, Microbial Evolution Laboratory, Center for Astrobiology (CSIC-INTA), Torrejón de Ardoz, Spain
  9. Guillermo Gosset, Departamento de Ingeniería Celular y Biocatálisis, Instituto de Biotecnología, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Cuernavaca, Mexico
  10. Roshan Gul, Department of Biotechnology, Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana-Ambala, Haryana, India
  11. Sabine A.E. Heider, GSK Vaccines S.r.I., Siena, Italy
  12. Nadja A. Henke, Chair of Genetics of Prokaryotes, Faculty of Biology & CeBiTec, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
  13. Thomas Isbrandt, DTU Bioengineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
  14. Sunil H. Koli, School of Life Sciences, North Maharashtra University, Maharashtra, India; and North Maharashtra Microbial Culture Collection Centre (NMCC), North Maharashtra University, Maharashtra, India
  15. Raman Kumar, Department of Biotechnology, Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana-Ambala (Haryana), India
  16. Thomas Ostenfeld Larsen, DTU Bioengineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
  17. Jennifer Lau, Division of Biological and Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Bradford, PA, USA
  18. Ana María Moreno, Microbial Evolution Laboratory, Center for Astrobiology (CSIC-INTA), Torrejón de Ardoz, Spain
  19. Rosemary C. Nwabuogu, Division of Biological and Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Bradford, PA, USA
  20. Satish V. Patil, School of Life Sciences, North Maharashtra University, Maharashtra, India; and North Maharashtra Microbial Culture Collection Centre (NMCC), North Maharashtra University, Maharashtra, India
  21. Petra Peters-Wendisch, Chair of Genetics of Prokaryotes, Faculty of Biology & CeBiTec, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
  22. B.V. Pradeep, Department of Microbiology, Karpagam University (Karpagam Academy of Higher Education), Tamil Nadu, India
  23. Jiancheng Qi, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
  24. Chandrashekhar D. Patil, School of Life Sciences, North Maharashtra University, Maharashtra, India
  25. Anil K. Sharma, Department of Biotechnology, Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana-Ambala (Haryana), India
  26. Om V. Singh, Division of Biological and Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Bradford, PA, USA
  27. Rahul K. Suryawanshi, School of Life Sciences, North Maharashtra University, Maharashtra, India; and North Maharashtra Microbial Culture Collection Centre (NMCC), North Maharashtra University, Maharashtra, India
  28. Gerit Tolborg, DTU Bioengineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
  29. Chidambaram Kulandaisamy Venil, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia
  30. Changlu Wang, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin, China
  31. Siyuan Wang, Department of Biological Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA
  32. Volker F. Wendisch, Chair of Genetics of Prokaryotes, Faculty of Biology & CeBiTec, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
  33. Mhairi Workman, DTU Bioengineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
  34. Fuchao Xu, Department of Biological Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA
  35. Nur Zulaikha Binti Yusof, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia
  36. Jixun Zhan, Department of Biological Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA

Introduction

Biological pigments are naturally occurring chemical compounds that impart certain colors. They serve a variety of functional purposes, such as absorbing ultraviolet (UV) light in order to promote photosynthesis, desorbing certain UV wavelengths to protect organisms from photo damage, and attracting organisms in order to promote mating or pollination. Color-based evaluation is essential, as it indicates fertility, nutritional value, flavor, toxicity, and food spoilage. Human society has incorporated knowledge of our instinctive color perceptions into marketing in order to increase the appeal of food items, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics.

Artificial food colors and synthetic and natural pigments are used as color additives to augment or correct imperfections in a food's natural color, indicate artificially flavored foods and medicines, or enhance a food's visual appeal. Color additives are used to provide color to foods whose natural color would potentially degrade during shipment and storage when exposed to UV light and extreme changes in temperature and humidity. In these cases, artificial color additives whose chemical structures are stable and do not degrade under various conditions may be preferable for marketing purposes. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), under the Food, Drugs and Cosmetics (FD&C) Act, Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR 170.3 and 21 CFR 170.30), has approved color additives in food as “GRAS” (Generally Recognized as Safe). The “safe” amount of an artificial color is known as the acceptable daily intake (ADI), measured in parts per million (ppm), that industries are legally permitted to use in products. However, if organisms, specifically humans and animals, cannot metabolize artificial chemical compounds, then how much of a dose is considered “safe” for consumption remains questionable.

The quandary lies directly in the advantage provided by chemically stable compounds. Naturally occurring pigments are biological derivatives of organic compounds that can be metabolically or chemically broken down because they serve to synchronize with organismal demands. Artificial chemical colors, on the other hand, are derivatives of coal tar and petroleum, which cannot be degraded completely. Therefore, artificial pigments are potentially perilous to life because such chemical behaviors are asynchronous with biological function. Studies have shown that various artificial food colors are being linked to biological and neurological effects, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and cancer.

Synthesizing bio-pigments through unique microbial metabolic pathways could be the most appropriate way to develop safe natural pigments for industrial use. Understanding the genetic sequences for the biosynthetic metabolites provides further insight into how genes can be manipulated in microorganisms in order to obtain higher yields of specific biological pigments. The broader impact of producing bio-pigments from microorganisms will affect food science, pharmacology, and biomedical practices.

This book aims to bridge the technology gap and focuses on exploring microbial diversity and the various mechanisms regulating the biosynthesis of bio-pigments. Chapter 1 (Wang et al.) presents a variety of microbial pigments from eukaryotic and prokaryotic sources and discusses their properties and applications. Based on the demand of consumers for natural food colorants, Tolborg et al. in Chapter 2 discuss novel cell factories producing natural pigments in Europe. Due to their extraordinary properties, certain organisms, called “extremophiles” (mostly bacteria and archaea, and a few eukaryotes), can thrive under harsh environmental conditions. Garcia-Lopez et al. in Chapter 3 summarize our current understanding of pigments from microbial extremophiles and their potential applications in biotechnology.

Commercial processes for carotenoid production are already being employed. Microorganisms, particularly filamentous fungi, seem to be promising producers of biosynthesized pigments, due to their chemical and color versatility and stability. In Chapter 4, Dufossé presents the facts on current carotenoid production using various microorganisms. In continuation, Heider et al. in Chapter 5 note that the commercial value of carotenoids was reported as $1.5 billion in 2014 and discuss the use of biosynthesis, glycosylation, and metabolic engineering to meet the demand.

Carotenoids are classified by number of isoprene units. In Chapter 6, Nwabuogu et al. predominantly focus on the biosynthesis of β-carotene and its derivative pigments. They also present the native bacterial and fungal species responsible for the biosynthesis of these pigments, along with the molecular elements that regulate β-carotene biosynthesis and fermentation strategies around commercialization.

Among nontraditional pigments, melanin constitutes a diverse group of pigments present in most biological groups. Melanin production is dependent mainly on the activity of enzymes from the tyrosinase and laccase protein families. Gosset, in Chapter 7, presents the advances made in melanin production from microorganisms toward process development.

Monascus pigments, derived from the genus Monascus, are promising as additional or alternative natural food pigments. Wang et al. in Chapter 8 discuss the biochemistry and molecular mechanisms of Monascus pigments. In continuation, Koli et al. in Chapter 9 discuss the diversity and applications of versatile pigments produced by Monascus sp.

Agro-industrial wastes (e.g., livestock waste, manure, crop residue, food waste, molasses, etc.) are high-impact feedstocks with particular utility in the production of pigments. In Chapter 10, Venil et al. discuss the impact of agro-industrial waste and its application in microbial pigment production. In continuation, in Chapter 11, Akilandeswari and Pradeep explore the potential functions of and prospects for microbial pigments. Finally, Gul et al. in Chapter 12 summarize the use of microorganisms in biocolor production.

This book, Bio-pigmentation and Biotechnological Implementations, is a collection of outstanding articles elucidating several broad-ranging areas of progress and challenge in the utilization of microorganisms as sustainable resources in bio-pigmentation. It will contribute to research efforts in the scientific community and to commercially significant work for corporate businesses. The aim is to establish long-term safe and sustainable forms of biopigments through microbial biosynthesis, with minimum impact on the ecosystem.

We hope readers will find these chapters interesting and informative for their research pursuits. It has been my pleasure to put together this book with Wiley-Blackwell. I would like to thank all of the contributing authors for sharing their quality research and ideas with the scientific community through this work.