Cover Page

DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

THIRD EDITION

Volume Four: Risk, Resilience, and Intervention

Editor

DANTE CICCHETTI

 

Title Page

These volumes are dedicated to Marianne Gerschel in recognition of her great vision and staunch support of the field of developmental psychopathology.

Preface to Developmental Psychopathology, Third Edition

A decade has passed since the second edition of Developmental Psychopathology was published. The two prior editions (Cicchetti & Cohen, 1995, 2006) have been very influential in the growth of the field of developmental psychopathology. The volumes have been highly cited in the literature and have served as an important resource for developmental scientists and prevention and intervention researchers alike. In the present third edition, we have expanded from the three volumes contained in the second edition to four volumes. The increased number of volumes in this current edition reflects the continued knowledge gains that have occurred in the field over the past decade.

A not insignificant contributor to this growth can be found in the very principles of the discipline (Cicchetti, 1984, 1990, 1993; Cicchetti & Sroufe, 2000; Cicchetti & Toth, 1991, 2009; Rutter & Sroufe, 2000; Sroufe & Rutter, 1984). Theorists, researchers, and prevention scientists in the field of developmental psychopathology adhere to a life span framework to elucidate the numerous processes and mechanisms that can contribute to the development of mental disorders in high-risk individuals as well as those operative in individuals who already have manifested psychological disturbances or who have averted such disorders despite their high-risk status (Cicchetti, 1993; Masten, 2014; Rutter, 1986, 1987, 2012). Not only is knowledge of normal genetic, neurobiological, physiological, hormonal, psychological, and social processes very helpful for understanding, preventing, and treating psychopathology, but also deviations from and distortions of normal development that are seen in pathological processes indicate in innovative ways how normal development may be better investigated and understood. Similarly, information obtained from investigations of experiments of nature, high-risk conditions, and psychopathology can augment the comprehension of normal development (Cicchetti, 1984, 1990, 1993; Rutter, 1986; Rutter & Garmezy, 1983; Sroufe, 1990; Weiss, 1969).

Another factor that has expedited growth within the field of developmental psychopathology has been its ability to incorporate knowledge from diverse disciplines and to encourage interdisciplinary and translational research (Cicchetti & Gunnar, 2009; Cicchetti & Toth, 2006). In keeping with its integrative focus, contributions to developmental psychopathology have come from many disciplines of the biological and social sciences. A wide array of content areas, scientific disciplines, and methodologies has been germane. Risk and protective factors and processes have been identified and validated at multiple levels of analysis and in multiple domains.

The increased emphasis on a multilevel, dynamic systems approach to psychopathology and resilience, the increased attention paid to gene–environment interplay in the development of psychopathology and resilience, and the application of a multiple levels of analysis developmental perspective to mental illnesses that have traditionally been examined nondevelopmentally (e.g., bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and the personality disorders) not only have contributed to a deeper understanding of the dysfunctions but also have educated the public about the causes and consequences of mental disorder (see Cicchetti & Cannon, 1999; Cicchetti & Crick, 2009a, 2009b; Miklowitz & Cicchetti, 2006, 2010; Tackett & Sharp, 2014).

Advances in genomics, GxE interactions, and epigenetics; growth in our understanding of neurobiology, neural plasticity, and resilience; and progress in the development of methodological and technological tools, including brain imaging, neural circuitry, hormone assays, immunology, social and environmental influences on brain development, and statistical analysis of developmental change, pave the way for interdisciplinary and for multiple levels of analysis research programs that will significantly increase the knowledge base of the development and course of maladaptation, psychopathology, and resilience. Moreover, randomized control prevention and intervention trials are being conducted based on theoretical models and efforts to elucidate the mechanisms and processes contributing to developmental change at both the biological and psychological levels (Belsky & van IJzendoorn, 2015; Cicchetti & Gunnar, 2008).

Despite the significant advances that have occurred in the field of developmental psychopathology, much important work lies ahead. Undoubtedly these future developments will build on the venerable contributions of the past; however, as work in the field becomes increasingly interdisciplinary, multilevel, and technologically sophisticated, it is essential that even more emphasis be directed toward the process of development (Harter, 2006; Sroufe, 2007, 2013). It is not only genes and environments but also the cumulative developmental history of the individual that influences how future development will unfold (Sroufe, 2007, 2013).

Developmental psychopathologists have incorporated concepts and methods derived from other disciplinary endeavors that are too often isolated from each other, thereby generating advances in knowledge that might have been missed in the absence of cross-disciplinary dialogue. The continuation and elaboration of the mutually enriching interchanges that have occurred within and across disciplines interested in normal and abnormal development not only will enhance the science of developmental psychopathology but also will increase the benefits to be derived for individuals with high-risk conditions or mental disorders, families, and society as a whole.

Dante Cicchetti, Ph.D.
Minneapolis, MN
January 2015

References

  1. Belsky, J., & van IJzendoorn, M. (2015). What works for whom? Genetic moderation of intervention efficacy. [Special Section]. Development and Psychopathology, 27, 1–6.
  2. Cicchetti, D. (1984). The emergence of developmental psychopathology. Child Development, 55(1), 1–7.
  3. Cicchetti, D. (1990). A historical perspective on the discipline of developmental psychopathology. In J. Rolf, A. Masten, D. Cicchetti, K. Nuechterlein, & S. Weintraub (Eds.), Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology (pp. 2–28). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Cicchetti, D. (1993). Developmental psychopathology: Reactions, reflections, projections. Developmental Review, 13, 471–502.
  5. Cicchetti, D., & Cannon, T. (1999). Neurodevelopmental processes in the ontogenesis and epigenesis of psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 375–393.
  6. Cicchetti, D., & Cohen, D. (Eds.). (1995). Developmental psychopathology (Vols. 1–2). New York, NY: Wiley.
  7. Cicchetti, D., & Cohen, D. (Eds.). (2006). Developmental psychopathology (2nd ed., Vols. 1–3). New York, NY: Wiley.
  8. Cicchetti, D., & Crick, N. R. (Eds.) (2009a). Precursors of and diverse pathways to personality disorder in children and adolescents. [Special Issue, Part 1]. Development and Psychopathology, 21(3), 683–1030.
  9. Cicchetti, D., & Crick, N. R. (Eds.). (2009b). Precursors of and diverse pathways to personality disorder in children and adolescents. [Special Issue, Part 2]. Development and Psychopathology, 21(4), 1031–1381.
  10. Cicchetti, D., & Gunnar, M. R. (2008). Integrating biological processes into the design and evaluation of preventive interventions. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 737–743.
  11. Cicchetti, D., & Gunnar, M. R. (Eds.). (2009). Meeting the challenge of translational research in child psychology: Minnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 35). New York, NY: Wiley.
  12. Cicchetti, D., & Sroufe, L. A. (2000). The past as prologue to the future: The times they've been a changin'. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 255–264.
  13. Cicchetti, D., & Toth, S. L. (1991). The making of a developmental psychopathologist. In J. Cantor, C. Spiker, & L. Lipsitt (Eds.), Child behavior and development: Training for diversity (pp. 34–72). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  14. Cicchetti, D., & Toth, S. L. (Eds.). (2006). Translational research in developmental psychopathology. [Special Issue]. Development and Psychopathology, 18(3), 619–933.
  15. Cicchetti, D., & Toth, S. L. (2009). The past achievements and future promises of developmental psychopathology: The coming of age of a discipline. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 16–25.
  16. Harter, S. (2006). Self-processes and developmental psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology (2nd ed., 370–418). New York, NY: Wiley.
  17. Masten, A. S. (2014). Ordinary magic: Resilience in development. New York, NY: Guilford Publications, Inc.
  18. Miklowitz, D. J., & Cicchetti, D. (2006). Toward a life span developmental psychopathology perspective on bipolar disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 18, 935–938.
  19. Miklowitz, D. J., & Cicchetti, D. (Eds.). (2010). Bipolar disorder: A developmental psychopathology approach. New York, NY: Guilford.
  20. Rutter, M. (1986). Child psychiatry: The interface between clinical and developmental research. Psychological Medicine, 16, 151–169.
  21. Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57, 316–331.
  22. Rutter, M. (2012). Resilience as a dynamic concept. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 335–344.
  23. Rutter, M., & Garmezy, N. (1983). Developmental psychopathology. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 774–911). New York, NY: Wiley.
  24. Rutter, M., & Sroufe, L. A. (2000). Developmental psychopathology: Concepts and challenges. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 265–296.
  25. Sroufe, L. A. (1990). Considering normal and abnormal together: The essence of developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 2, 335–347.
  26. Sroufe, L. A. (2007). The place of development in developmental psychopathology. In A. Masten (Ed.), Multilevel dynamics in developmental psychopathology pathways to the future: The Minnesota symposia on child psychology (pp. 285–299). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  27. Sroufe, L. A. (2013). The promise of developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 25, 1215–1224.
  28. Sroufe, L. A., & Rutter, M. (1984). The domain of developmental psychopathology. Child Development, 55, 17–29.
  29. Tackett, J. L., & Sharp, C. (2014). A developmental psychopathology perspective on personality disorder. [Special Issue]. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 1–179.
  30. Weiss, P. (1969). Principles of development. New York, NY: Hafner.

Contributors

  1. Manuel Barrera, Jr., PhD
  2. Arizona State University
  3. Tempe, Arizona
  1. Marc H. Bornstein, PhD
  2. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  3. Bethesda, Maryland
  1. Keith B. Burt, PhD
  2. University of Vermont
  3. Burlington, Vermont
  1. Jocelyn S. Carter, PhD
  2. DePaul University
  3. Chicago, Illinois
  1. Juan F. Casas, PhD
  2. University of Nebraska
  3. Omaha, Nebraska
  1. Edith Chen, PhD
  2. Northwestern University
  3. Evanston, Illinois
  1. Xinyin Chen, PhD
  2. University of Pennsylvania
  3. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  1. Dante Cicchetti, PhD
  2. Institute of Child Development
  3. University of Minnesota
  4. Minneapolis, Minnesota
  1. J. Douglas Coatsworth, PhD
  2. Colorado State University
  3. Fort Collins, Colorado
  1. Nicki R. Crick, PhD
  2. University of Minnesota
  3. Minneapolis, Minnesota
  1. Jessica Dollar, PhD
  2. University of North Carolina
  3. Greensboro, North Carolina
  1. Sophia Duffy, PhD
  2. DePaul University
  3. Chicago, Illinois
  1. Katherine B. Ehrlich, PhD
  2. Northwestern University
  3. Evanston, Illinois
  1. Gary W. Evans, PhD
  2. Cornell University
  3. Ithaca, New York
  1. Nathan A. Fox, PhD
  2. University of Maryland
  3. College Park, Maryland
  1. Nancy A. Gonzales, PhD
  2. Arizona State University
  3. Tempe, Arizona
  1. Rebecca Goodvin, PhD
  2. Western Washington University
  3. Bellingham, Washington
  1. Kathryn Grant, PhD
  2. DePaul University
  3. Chicago, Illinois
  1. Julie A. Gravener-Davis, PhD
  2. Mt. Hope Family Center
  3. Rochester, New York
  1. Elizabeth D. Handley, PhD
  2. Mt. Hope Family Center
  3. Rochester, New York
  1. Stephen P. Hinshaw, PhD
  2. University of California
  3. Berkeley, California
  1. Ernest N. Jouriles, PhD
  2. Southern Methodist University
  3. Dallas, Texas
  1. Robert-Paul Juster, MSc, PhD
  2. McGill University
  3. Montreal, Canada
  1. Chrystyna D. Kouros, PhD
  2. Southern Methodist UniversityDallas, TX
  1. Dave Lanoix, PhD
  2. Centre for Studies on Human Stress
  3. Montreal, Canada
  1. Anna S. Lau, PhD
  2. University of California
  3. Los Angeles, California
  1. Cindy H. Liu, PhD
  2. Harvard Medical School
  3. Boston, Massachusetts
  1. Sonia J. Lupien, PhD
  2. University of Montreal
  3. Montreal, Canada
  1. Ian Mahar, BSc
  2. McGill University
  3. Montreal, Canada
  1. Andres G. Martinez, PhD
  2. University of California
  3. Berkeley, California
  1. Ann S. Masten, PhD
  2. Institute of Child Development
  3. University of Minnesota
  4. Minneapolis, Minnesota
  1. Renee McDonald, PhD
  2. Southern Methodist University
  3. Dallas, Texas
  1. Bruce S. McEwen, PhD
  2. Rockefeller University
  3. New York, New York
  1. Naguib Mechawar, PhD
  2. McGill University
  3. Montreal, Canada
  1. Gregory E. Miller, PhD
  2. Northwestern University
  3. Evanston, Illinois
  1. Dianna Murray-Close, PhD
  2. University of Vermont
  3. Burlington, Vermont
  1. Velma M. Murry, PhD
  2. Vanderbilt University
  3. Nashville, Tennessee
  1. Charles A. Nelson, PhD
  2. Harvard University
  3. Boston, Massachusetts
  4. and
  5. Boston Children's Hospital
  6. Boston, Massachusetts
  1. David A. Nelson, PhD
  2. Brigham Young University
  3. Provo, Utah
  1. Jamie M. Ostrov, PhD
  2. University at Buffalo, The State University of New York
  3. Buffalo, New York
  1. Isabelle Ouellet-Morin, PhD
  2. University of Montreal
  3. Montreal, Canada
  1. Christie L. M. Petrenko, PhD
  2. Mt. Hope Family Center
  3. Rochester, New York
  1. Robert C. Pianta, PhD
  2. University of Virginia
  3. Charlottesville, Virginia
  1. Martin Picard, PhD
  2. Columbia University
  3. New York, New York
  1. Armando A. Pina, PhD
  2. Arizona State University
  3. Tempe, Arizona
  1. Pierrich Plusquellec, PhD
  2. University of Montreal
  3. Montreal, Canada
  1. Robert M. Post, MD
  2. Bipolar Collaborative Network
  3. Bethesda, Maryland
  1. Zoltan Sarnyai, PhD, MD
  2. James Cook University
  3. Townsville, Australia
  1. Teresa Seeman, PhD
  2. University of California
  3. Los Angeles, California
  1. Shireen Sindi, PhD
  2. McGill University
  3. Montreal, Canada
  1. Ellen A. Skinner, PhD
  2. Portland State University
  3. Portland, Oregon
  1. Nathan Grant Smith, PhD
  2. University of Houston
  3. Houston, Texas
  1. Juliana Souza-Talarico, PhD
  2. University of São Paulo
  3. São Paulo, Brazil
  1. Margaret Beale Spencer, PhD
  2. University of Chicago
  3. Chicago, Illinois
  1. Cynthia Stifter, PhD
  2. Pennsylvania State University
  3. University Park, Pennsylvania
  1. Dena Phillips Swanson, PhD
  2. University of Rochester
  3. Rochester, New York
  1. Ross A. Thompson, PhD
  2. University of California
  3. Davis, California
  1. Patrick H. Tolan, PhD
  2. University of Virginia
  3. Charlottesville, Virginia
  1. Sheree L. Toth, PhD
  2. Mt. Hope Family Center
  3. Rochester, New York
  1. Martha E. Wadsworth, PhD
  2. Pennsylvania State University
  3. University Park, Pennsylvania
  1. Charles H. Zeanah, PhD
  2. Tulane University
  3. New Orleans, Louisiana
  1. Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck, PhD
  2. Griffith University
  3. Gold Coast, Australia