Cover Page

Systematically Working with Multimodal Data

Research Methods in Multimodal Discourse Analysis

Sigrid Norris






No alt text required.






To Alan

List of Figures

Figure 2.1Mediated action: feeding a baby dragon.
Figure 3.1Ethical considerations: people have a basic right not to take part in a study.
Figure 3.2Recording in public places where we were not interested in particular individuals’ actions: no need for consent.
Figure 3.3A specific individual recorded in public places: a need for consent. Reproduced with permission of the participant.
Figure 3.4Position of researchers and camera in relation to the video recorded (inter)action.
Figure 3.5Snapshot of screen on the day the YouTube clip was selected as data piece.
Figure 3.6The researcher as viewer and multimodal analyst of the video.
Figure 3.7Diagram 1 – birdseye view of the table and computer set up.
Figure 3.8Position of the researcher in room A.2
Figure 3.9Position of the researcher in room B.2
Figure 3.10A view of all collected data of one dyadic team working via video conferencing technology, collated, synchronized, and time stamped. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Figure 3.11Position of the researchers while recording Family 2. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Figure 3.12A view of all collected data of Family 2’s video conferencing (inter)action, collated, synchronized, and time stamped. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Figure 4.1The site of engagement that embraces the researcher(s) and the data set.
Figure 4.2Screenshot of a representative data piece.
Figure 4.3The site of engagement that embraces the researcher and a data piece.
Figure 4.4The site of engagement of the data set: YouTube clip from Ellentube on 2 July 2016.
Figure 4.5The site of engagement of a YouTube video data set that includes the researcher as relevant social actor.
Figure 4.6A data piece: Kai Sings “Cake by the Ocean”.
Figure 4.7The site of engagement of a researcher/viewer watching/analyzing the clip Kai Sings “Cake by the Ocean”.
Figure 4.8Sub‐data set: comprising the large scale higher‐level mediated action of one dyad taking part in the experimental study with many smaller scale higher‐level actions.
Figure 4.9Site of engagement of the entire data set including the researcher(s).
Figure 4.10Data: a screenshot of a dyad working on a task via video conferencing technology. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Figure 4.11Site of engagement: researcher analyzing the recorded (inter)action of a team working on a task via video conferencing technology. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Figure 4.12Sub‐data set: comprising the large scale higher‐level mediated action of one family taking part in the video ethnography with many smaller scale higher‐level mediated actions.
Figure 4.13Site of engagement of the entire data set including the researcher(s).
Figure 4.14A site of engagement that embraces the researchers and a one‐family data set.
Figure 4.15Data: a screenshot of a recorded video conferencing (inter)action. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Figure 4.16Site of engagement: researcher analyzing the recorded video conferencing (inter)action. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Figure 5.1A narrow site of engagement for micro analysis example YouTube.
Figure 5.2A narrow site of engagement for micro analysis teamwork example. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Figure 5.3A narrow site of engagement for micro analysis example family video conferencing. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Figure 6.1Transcript of the broader layout of the stages in the YouTube clip Kai Sings “Cake by the Ocean.”
Figure 6.2Layout of the first 40 seconds in the video clip – camera angles.
Figure 6.3Layout transcript for the first 6 seconds, YouTube example.
Figure 6.4Proxemics transcript for the mother of the triplets. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Figure 6.5Upper‐body posture transcript for the man in the dyad. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Figure 6.6Leg and foot movement transcript for the man in the dyad. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Figure 6.7Noting times and actions.
Figure 6.8Gesture transcript of the man on the right in the images. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Figure 6.9Gaze transcript for the woman with the pony tail. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Figure 6.10Head‐movement transcript (Images 1–8) for the woman with the pony tail. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Figure 6.11Head‐movement transcript (Images 9–18) for the woman with the pony tail. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Figure 6.12Facial expression transcript. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Figure 6.13Object handling transcript for the man in the dyad. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Figure 6.14Spoken language transcript overlaid over the top of the gesture transcript. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Figure 6.15Written language/image transcript. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Figure 6.16Producing a final transcript: gaze and head‐movement transcript collated. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Figure 7.1Natural experienced time cycles and rhythms.

List of Tables

Table 3.1Data collection table.
Table 3.2Sample of a data collection table for our YouTube example.
Table 3.3Sample of a data collection table for our experimental study. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Table 3.4Sample of a data collection table for our video ethnographic study. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Table 4.1Data set table.
Table 4.2The data set: comprising three dyads working on two tasks each, plus individual interviews clearly showing the length of the recordings, as well as notes. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Table 4.3(Part of) a full data set: comprising participants (adults and children), their relationships, devices, and animals present in the video conferencing project as well as the length of the recordings. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Table 5.1Higher‐level mediated action table of an imaginary data set.
Table 5.2Bundled higher‐level mediated action table of an imaginary data set.
Table 5.3Higher‐level mediated action table YouTube example.
Table 5.4Incorrect higher‐level mediated action table YouTube example.
Table 5.5Color coded bundles of higher‐level mediated action table YouTube example.
Table 5.6Bundled higher‐level mediated action table YouTube example.
Table 5.7Higher‐level mediated action table teamwork example. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Table 5.8Incorrect higher‐level mediated action table teamwork example. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Table 5.9Color coded bundles of higher‐level mediated action table teamwork example. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Table 5.10Bundled higher‐level mediated action table teamwork example. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Table 5.11Higher‐level mediated action table video ethnography example. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Table 5.12Incorrect higher‐level mediated action table video ethnography example. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Table 5.13Color coded bundles of higher‐level mediated action table video ethnography example. Reproduced with permission of the participants.
Table 5.14Bundled higher‐level mediated action table video ethnography example. Reproduced with permission of the participants.

Acknowledgments

The book has taken a substantial amount of time to write and I thank the editors at Wiley for their patience. Many people have been helpful along the way, but if I was naming everyone who had had an impact upon the many pages before you, these acknowledgments would turn into the longest chapter of the book. I think most people who have had contact with me over the last few years, who have asked a question with regard to multimodal data collection, data analysis, reliability of qualitative research, or the like, would have had an impact upon my writing of this book. Here, I would like to thank all of you for your interest, curiosity, and trust in me having an answer to these questions. I do hope that you will find at least some of your answers in the pages ahead and I hope that you will find the book useful. I know that I have promised many a reader that I would answer questions, that I would write a book that explained how I work with data, and I hope that you will not be disappointed.

There are also a few people who I will name and first, some members of the Multimodal Research Center, who have had the greatest impact upon my writing and who deserve special thanks. I thank Tui Matelau, Yulia Khan, and Ivana Rajic for their questions as they were working with the phases and steps and their support in writing this book; a particular thank you goes to Jesse Pirini, who read very early drafts of some sections and who found my writing of the how‐to sections for data analysis incredibly useful. Special thanks also go to Jarret Geenen, who visited the Center in early 2017 and was a catalyst in my explaining some theory in great detail. Both Jarret’s input with regard to the need for theory to be covered and Jesse’s input during this early writing stage of phases and steps solidified my thinking. I would also like to thank Elina Tapio and Chloe Grace Fogarty‐Bourget, who were visiting researchers at the Multimodal Research Centre and tried out some of the phases and steps for data analysis. They both had valuable feedback and questions with regard to the systematic approach. Further, I would like to thank Edgar Bernad‐Mechó, another visiting scholar, who also tried out some phases and steps and who emphasized that I needed to include not only data analysis, but also to outline data collection and transcription in the same book.

Of course, all participants, in our projects have been of utmost importance. Without participants, we cannot do our work. But here, I am most grateful to the participants who are featured in this book. Every participant and every family featured has viewed the videos, tables, and images and permitted them to be published as shown. Featuring color images of real participants and being able to use excerpts of our data to give students and researchers hands‐on experience makes this book special. Therefore, I would like to thank the following participants of the studies for their permission to publish their images, names and videos as part of this book: Abbie O’Rourke, Ali, the Budd Family and the Charko Family, Cameron Fraser, Dunja Vajsakovic, Isla Connors, Dina‐Sara Vajsakovic, Edgar Bernad‐Mechó, Hana Mlinac, Ivana Mlinac, Ivana Rajic, Jay Nam, Jake Connors, Jo Connors, Luke Norris, Melanie, Michael Evans, Rachelle Ferguson, Shymala Sidharth, Sophie Connors, and Brownderbag Tagaloa.

I would like to thank the Faculty of Design and Creative Technologies, the School of Communication Studies, and the AUT Multimodal Research Centre at Auckland University of Technology in New Zealand for funding the projects and making the writing of this book possible.

I would also like to thank Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS), University of Freiburg, Germany and the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under REA grant agreement no. [609305] for making the completion of this book possible.

Then, there is family. Family is always most important for my writing. Luke and Kevin, with their humor and light‐heartedness as well as the many beautifully prepared meals, particularly by our nutritionist, Luke, always helped me to switch off. Alan, as always, has been more supportive than I can ever explain. He has accompanied me to many destinations from New Zealand to Germany, a ski resort in Austria, a monastery in Spain, the hills of Tuscany, Sicily, Florence, and Rome in Italy, to Chamonix as well as around Nice in France, to Los Angeles and San Francisco in the USA, to Budapest in Hungary, to Stockholm and Lingköping in Sweden, or to Aarhus and Aalborg in Denmark, all the while bearing with me as I was trying to write this book. He sought out hotels that allowed me to continue my writing and has been the kindest companion, who only once stopped me from finishing a section. This was in San Sebastián, where I was typing away, while he had been out and around town. When he came back to the hotel, I was still typing away, but he looked at me earnestly and requested I stop writing and have a look at the beautiful city. How right he was! We had an unforgettable afternoon and evening in San Sebastián and when we left the next morning, I was still happy that I had not finished the section. Now, whenever I come across the section that I did not finish in San Sebastián, I remember our wonderful time there. But this is only one beautiful memory during my book‐writing travels and for me, Alan is visible in many parts of this book and I dedicate this book to him.

While so many people have had an impact upon my writing of this book, all shortcomings, of course, are my very own. I do hope that the book will be useful to many students, teachers, and researchers alike and I hope you will enjoy the many examples and forgive the shortcomings.

About the Companion Website

This book is accompanied by a companion website:

www.wiley.com/go/Norris/multimodal‐data

The website includes:

  • Videos
  • Transcript

image

Chapter 1
Introduction