Details

Contemporary Debates in Bioethics


Contemporary Debates in Bioethics


Contemporary Debates in Philosophy, Band 27 1. Aufl.

von: Arthur L. Caplan, Robert Arp

32,99 €

Verlag: Wiley-Blackwell
Format: EPUB
Veröffentl.: 22.07.2013
ISBN/EAN: 9781118328477
Sprache: englisch
Anzahl Seiten: 536

DRM-geschütztes eBook, Sie benötigen z.B. Adobe Digital Editions und eine Adobe ID zum Lesen.

Beschreibungen

<p><i>Contemporary Debates in Bioethics</i> features a timely collection of highly readable, debate-style arguments contributed by many of today's top bioethics scholars, focusing on core bioethical concerns of the twenty-first century.</p> <ul> <li>Written in an engaging, debate-style format for accessibility to non-specialists</li> <li>Features general introductions to each topic that precede scholarly debates</li> <li>Presents the latest, cutting-edge thoughts on relevant bioethics ideas, arguments, and debates</li> </ul>
Notes on Contributors x <p>Acknowledgments xiv</p> <p>General Introduction 1</p> <p>References 8</p> <p><b>Part 1 Are There Universal Ethical Principles That Should Govern the Conduct of Medicine and Research Worldwide? 13</b></p> <p>Introduction 13</p> <p>References 15</p> <p>1 There Are Universal Ethical Principles That Should Govern the Conduct of Medicine and Research Worldwide 17<br /> <i>Daryl Pullman</i></p> <p>2 There Are No Universal Ethical Principles That Should Govern the Conduct of Medicine and Research Worldwide 27<br /> <i>Kevin S. Decker</i></p> <p>Reply to Decker 36</p> <p>Reply to Pullman 39</p> <p><b>Part 2 Is It Morally Acceptable to Buy and Sell Organs for Human Transplantation? 43</b></p> <p>Introduction 43</p> <p>References 45</p> <p>3 It Is Morally Acceptable to Buy and Sell Organs for Human Transplantation: Moral Puzzles and Policy Failures 47<br /> <i>Mark J. Cherry</i></p> <p>4 It Is Not Morally Acceptable to Buy and Sell Organs for Human Transplantation: A Very Poor Solution to a Very Pressing Problem 59<br /> <i>Arthur L. Caplan</i></p> <p>Reply to Caplan 68</p> <p>Reply to Cherry 70</p> <p><b>Part 3 Were It Physically Safe, Would Human Reproductive Cloning Be Acceptable? 73</b></p> <p>Introduction 73</p> <p>References 76</p> <p>5 Were It Physically Safe, Human Reproductive Cloning Would Be Acceptable 79<br /> <i>Katrien Devolder</i></p> <p>6 Were It Physically Safe, Human Reproductive Cloning Would Not Be Acceptable 89<br /> <i>Stephen E. Levick</i></p> <p>Reply to Levick 98</p> <p>Reply to Devolder 101</p> <p><b>Part 4 Is the Deliberately Induced Abortion of a Human Pregnancy Ethically Justifiable? 105</b></p> <p>Introduction 105</p> <p>References 109</p> <p>7 The Deliberately Induced Abortion of a Human Pregnancy Is Ethically Justifiable 111<br /> <i>Jeffrey Reiman</i></p> <p>8 The Deliberately Induced Abortion of a Human Pregnancy Is Not Ethically Justifiable 120<br /> <i>Don Marquis</i></p> <p>Reply to Marquis 129</p> <p>Reply to Reiman 132</p> <p><b>Part 5 Is It Ethical to Patent or Copyright Genes, Embryos, or Their Parts? 137</b></p> <p>Introduction 137</p> <p>References 141</p> <p>9 It Is Ethical to Patent or Copyright Genes, Embryos, or Their Parts 143<br /> <i>Lawrence M. Sung</i></p> <p>10 It Is Not Ethical to Patent or Copyright Genes, Embryos, or Their Parts 152<br /> <i>David Koepsell</i></p> <p>Reply to Koepsell 162</p> <p>Reply to Sung 164</p> <p><b>Part 6 Should a Child Have the Right to Refuse Medical Treatment to Which the Child’s Parents or Guardians Have Consented? 167</b></p> <p>Introduction 167</p> <p>References 171</p> <p>11 The Child Should Have the Right to Refuse Medical Treatment to Which the Child’s Parents or Guardians Have Consented 173<br /> <i>William J. Winslade</i></p> <p>12 The Child Should Not Have the Right to Refuse Medical Treatment to Which the Child’s Parents or Guardians Have Consented 181<br /> <i>Catherine M. Brooks</i></p> <p>Reply to Brooks 192</p> <p>Reply to Winslade 194</p> <p><b>Part 7 Is Physician-Assisted Suicide Ever Ethical? 197</b></p> <p>Introduction 197</p> <p>References 201</p> <p>13 Physician-Assisted Suicide Is Ethical 203<br /> <i>John Lachs</i></p> <p>14 Physician-Assisted Suicide Is Not Ethical 213<br /> <i>Patrick Lee</i></p> <p>Reply to Lee 222</p> <p>Reply to Lachs 225</p> <p><b>Part 8 Should Stem-Cell Research Utilizing Embryonic Tissue Be Conducted? 229</b></p> <p>Introduction 229</p> <p>References 233</p> <p>15 Stem-Cell Research Utilizing Embryonic Tissue Should Be Conducted 237<br /> <i>Jane Maienschein</i></p> <p>16 Stem-Cell Research Utilizing Embryonic Tissue Should Not Be Conducted 248<br /> <i>Bertha Alvarez Manninen</i></p> <p>Joint Reply 259</p> <p><b>Part 9 Should We Prohibit the Use of Chimpanzees and Other Great Apes in Biomedical Research? 261</b></p> <p>Introduction 261</p> <p>References 268</p> <p>17 We Should Prohibit the Use of Chimpanzees and Other Great Apes in Biomedical Research 271<br /> <i>Jean Kazez</i></p> <p>18 We Should Not Prohibit the Use of Chimpanzees and Other Great Apes in Biomedical Research 281<br /> <i>Carl Cohen</i></p> <p>Reply to Cohen 291</p> <p>Reply to Kazez 294</p> <p><b>Part 10 Should the United States of America Adopt Universal Healthcare? 297</b></p> <p>Introduction 297</p> <p>References 301</p> <p>19 The United States of America Should Adopt Universal Healthcare 303<br /> <i>John Geyman</i></p> <p>20 The United States of America Should Not Adopt Universal Healthcare: Let’s Try Freedom Instead 314<br /> <i>Glen Whitman</i></p> <p>Reply to Whitman 327</p> <p>Reply to Geyman 331</p> <p><b>Part 11 Is There a Legitimate Place for Human Genetic Enhancement? 335</b></p> <p>Introduction 335</p> <p>References 339</p> <p>21 There Is a Legitimate Place for Human Genetic Enhancement 343<br /> <i>Nicholas Agar</i></p> <p>22 There Is No Legitimate Place for Human Genetic Enhancement: The Slippery Slope to Genocide 353<br /> <i>Edwin Black</i></p> <p>Reply to Black 363</p> <p>Reply to Agar 366</p> <p><b>Part 12 Can There Be Agreement as to What Constitutes Human Death? 369</b></p> <p>Introduction 369</p> <p>References 374</p> <p>23 There Can Be Agreement as to What Constitutes Human Death 377<br /> <i>James L. Bernat</i></p> <p>24 There Cannot Be Agreement as to What Constitutes Human Death: Against Definitions, Necessary and Sufficient Conditions, and Determinate Boundaries 388<br /> <i>Winston Chiong</i></p> <p>Reply to Chiong 397</p> <p>Reply to Bernat 399</p> <p><b>Part 13 Is There Ever a Circumstance in Which a Doctor May Withhold Information? 401</b></p> <p>Introduction 401</p> <p>References 407</p> <p>25 There Are Circumstances in Which a Doctor May Withhold Information 409<br /> <i>Tom L. Beauchamp</i></p> <p>26 There Are No Circumstances in Which a Doctor May Withhold Information 418<br /> <i>Jason T. Eberl</i></p> <p>Reply to Eberl 428</p> <p>Reply to Beauchamp 431</p> <p><b>Part 14 Should In Vitro Fertilization Be an Option for a Woman? 435</b></p> <p>Introduction 435</p> <p>References 439</p> <p>27 In Vitro Fertilization Should Be an Option for a Woman 441<br /> <i>Laura Purdy</i></p> <p>28 In Vitro Fertilization Should Not Be an Option for a Woman 451<br /> <i>Christopher Tollefsen</i></p> <p>Reply to Tollefsen 460</p> <p>Reply to Purdy 462</p> <p><b>Part 15 Are International Clinical Trials Exploitative? 465</b></p> <p>Introduction 465</p> <p>References 470</p> <p>29 Clinical Trials Are Inherently Exploitative: The Likelihood That They Are Is High 473<br /> <i>Jamie Carlin Watson</i></p> <p>30 International Clinical Trials Are Not Inherently Exploitative 485<br /> <i>Richard J. Arneson</i></p> <p>Reply to Arneson 495</p> <p>Reply to Watson 498</p> <p>Index 501</p>
<p>“Summing Up: Recommended.  Lower-division undergraduates through graduate students.” <i> </i>(<i>Choice</i>, 1 July 2014)</p>
<p><b>Arthur L. Caplan</b> is the Ors William F. and Virginia Connolly Mitty Professor and Head of the Division of Bioethics at New York University Langone Medical Center in New York City. He is the author or editor of 30 books and more than 550 papers in refereed journals. His most recent books are <i>Smart Mice Not So Smart People</i> (2006) and the <i>Penn Guide to Bioethics</i> (2009).</p> <p><b>Robert Arp</b> is co-editor of <i>Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology</i> (2009), author of <i>Scenario Visualization: An Evolutionary Account of Creative Problem Solving (2008), and co-editor of Information and Living Systems: Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives</i> (2011).
<p>“This outstanding volume brings the contemporary debates of bioethics to life. Thoughtful introductions to contextualize each topic combined with interactive debates result in an outstanding and unique resource.” </p> <p><i>David Magnus, Director, Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University</i> <p>“I savor controversies and debates and this riveting new book has 15 great ones from the field of bioethics, debates that transcend academic disputes to engage the public, public intellectuals, and the Supreme Court on topics like assisted suicide, gene patenting, human cloning, and health reform.” <p><i>Mark Siegler, University of Chicago</i> <p>Modern advances in medicine and biology are accompanied by an increasingly complex swirl of ethical dilemmas and debates. <i>Contemporary Debates in Bioethics</i> features a collection of divergent arguments contributed by today’s top bioethics scholars that focus on core bioethical concerns of the twenty-first century. After presenting highly accessible introductions to specific issues, chapters proceed to tackle each side of such topical concerns as international medical research, human cloning, markets in human organs, abortion, gene and embryo copyrighting, physician-assisted suicide, stem-cell research, primate research, biomedical enhancement, and more. Provocative and timely, <i>Contemporary Debates in Bioethics</i> introduces a variety of perspectives that allow readers at all levels to gain critical insights and a deeper understanding of some of the most controversial and important issues of our day.
<p>“This outstanding volume brings the contemporary debates of bioethics to life. Thoughtful introductions to contextualize each topic combined with interactive debates results in an outstanding and unique resource.” </p> <p>—David Magnus, Director, Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University</p> <p>“I savor controversies and debates and this riveting new book has 15 great ones from the field of bioethics, debates that transcend academic disputes to engage the public, public intellectuals, and the Supreme Court on topics like assisted suicide, gene patenting, human cloning, and health reform.”<br /> <br /> </p> <p>—Mark Siegler, University of Chicago</p>

Diese Produkte könnten Sie auch interessieren:

Ethics for Psychotherapists and Counselors
Ethics for Psychotherapists and Counselors
von: Sharon K. Anderson, Mitchell M. Handelsman
EPUB ebook
26,99 €
A Companion to Nietzsche
A Companion to Nietzsche
von: Keith Ansell-Pearson
EPUB ebook
42,99 €
You've Got To Be Kidding!
You've Got To Be Kidding!
von: John Capps, Donald Capps
EPUB ebook
20,99 €